An Approach for Engaging with a Mixed-Race, Rural Community Using Social Work Values and a Community-Based Participatory Research Framework

Keyes, Tasha Seneca; Vogel-Ferguson, Mary Beth; Patin, Kara

doi:10.1080/26408066.2019.1638865

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Articles on methodology concerned sampling and data collection [153][154][155][156], a need to use consistent measures and not conflate different constructs [123,127,128], a need to see participants as potentially being both survivors and perpetrators of violence [122], and the nocebo effect in trauma research [119]. Researchers offered recommendations on improving internal research validity when potential control group members with trauma do not identify themselves as having trauma [31,121], and many recommended using participatory research methods to conduct better research [132,135,137,138,155]. Gultekin et al (2019) [133] introduced the eco-social trauma intervention model, which may be used across disciplines to develop and pilot trauma-informed interventions, and Tol (2020) [139] described using a social justice framework for research.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review of recommendations in the English language on conducting research with trauma-exposed populations since publication of the Belmont report; thematic review of existing recommendations on research with trauma-exposed populations

Jefferson¹,

Stanhope

Jones-Harrell

et al. 2021

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To identify recommendations for conducting public health research with trauma-exposed populations. Methods Researchers searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for recommendations. Trauma that causes psychological impact was our exposure of interest and we excluded clinical articles on treating physical trauma. We reviewed titles and abstracts of 8,070 articles and full text of 300 articles. We analyzed recommendations with thematic analysis, generated questions from the existing pool of recommendations, and then summarized select gaps. Results We abstracted recommendations from 145 articles in five categories: community benefit, participant benefit, safety, researcher well-being, and recommendations for conduct of trauma research. Conclusions Gold standards to guide the conduct of trauma-informed public health research do not yet exist. The literature suggests participation in trauma research is not inherently harmful, and current recommendations concern using research to benefit communities and participants, protecting participants and researchers from harm, and improving professional practice. As public health researchers increasingly analyze trauma as a determinant of health, gold standards for the conduct of trauma-informed public health research would be appropriate and timely.

show abstract