2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2939067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach for Risk Prioritization in Construction Projects Using Analytic Network Process and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory

Abstract: Construction projects always deal with different types of risks such as financial problems, legal factors, availability of resources and other issues during the project lifecycle. According to the type, size and complexity of the project, the number and intensity of risks could be different and many projects cannot reach the project goals due to exposure to multiple risks. This study aims to propose a hybrid DEMATEL-ANP model for risk prioritization in construction projects and the originality of the work come… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second article, by Cheng et al [21], a DEMATEL-Fuzzy-ANP calculates preference weights of the criteria and then COPRAS-G method and fuzzy gray relations were employed to resolve conflicts that arose from differences in information and opinions. In fact, many authors couple DEMATEL and ANP to solve real world problems in project management, such as Karamoozian et al [43]. According to Si et al [41], solely using DEMATEL has advantages and disadvantages, which are shown on Table 1.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second article, by Cheng et al [21], a DEMATEL-Fuzzy-ANP calculates preference weights of the criteria and then COPRAS-G method and fuzzy gray relations were employed to resolve conflicts that arose from differences in information and opinions. In fact, many authors couple DEMATEL and ANP to solve real world problems in project management, such as Karamoozian et al [43]. According to Si et al [41], solely using DEMATEL has advantages and disadvantages, which are shown on Table 1.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter stage includes estimating the possibility and severity of each hazard. Risk analysis in transportation can be defined as multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems and mainly propose qualitative models which are based upon subjective evaluations [7], [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an appropriate MCDM should be realized for risk analysis in multimodal transportation while effectively solving multiple conflicting and interdependent issues [14]. To overcome the difficulty, this study proposes a novel framework for analyzing risks in multimodal freight transportation systems on the basis of the FAHP-DEA approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, resulting projects may have problems in project coordination and management [5]. In addition, the selection process should also consider organizational managerial capabilities such as resource management [7], value management [8], governance [9], risk management ( [10,11]), and stakeholder management ( [12][13][14]). These managerial capabilities support resource optimization and competitive value generation [15] to achieve organizational goals [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%