2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1446181109000364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approximate Matrix Inversion Procedure by Parallelization of the Sherman–morrison Formula

Abstract: The Sherman-Morrison formula is one scheme for computing the approximate inverse preconditioner of a large linear system of equations. However, parallelizing a preconditioning approach is not straightforward as it is necessary to include a sequential process in the matrix factorization. In this paper, we propose a formula that improves the performance of the Sherman-Morrison preconditioner by partially parallelizing the matrix factorization. This study shows that our parallel technique implemented on a PC clus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, the aism is not the favored method for computing large sparse linear systems of equations (1). Recently, in order to reduce computation time, Moriya et al [15] proposed a partially parallelized aism based on a technique developed by Naik [19], in which vectors were distributed in all processors that were making computations and communications were carried out in turns.…”
Section: E3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these reasons, the aism is not the favored method for computing large sparse linear systems of equations (1). Recently, in order to reduce computation time, Moriya et al [15] proposed a partially parallelized aism based on a technique developed by Naik [19], in which vectors were distributed in all processors that were making computations and communications were carried out in turns.…”
Section: E3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter s in the aism was set to 1.5 × A ∞ or 15 × A ∞ . The default value was 1.5× A ∞ [3,15]. The tolerance of U and V was tolU = tolV = tol, where tol was set to 0.1 or 0.01.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%