Engineering Asset Management
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Auditing Process to Improve Asset Management Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective was to provide a measure for comparing the organization's maintenance management productivity to accepted standards (Stoneham 1998;Kaiser 1991), which permits the identification of areas needing improvements and the appropriate corrective actions to follow, as well as the identification of adequate procedures for monitoring the outcome of those corrective actions (Kaiser 1991;Wilson 2002;Visser and Mollentze 2006;Carnero 2009). …”
Section: Maintenance Auditmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main objective was to provide a measure for comparing the organization's maintenance management productivity to accepted standards (Stoneham 1998;Kaiser 1991), which permits the identification of areas needing improvements and the appropriate corrective actions to follow, as well as the identification of adequate procedures for monitoring the outcome of those corrective actions (Kaiser 1991;Wilson 2002;Visser and Mollentze 2006;Carnero 2009). …”
Section: Maintenance Auditmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed MENFIS and CAMPUS questionnaires were designed to help the initial process of gathering information (Wilson 2002;Visser and Mollentze 2006).…”
Section: Maintenance Audit Structurementioning
confidence: 99%