Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2351676.2351695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated approach to forecasting QoS attributes based on linear and non-linear time series modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we plan to increase the order of the filter to further improve its ability of trading off reaction to changes versus robustness to outliers. Finally, we plan to investigate the combination of LAF with forecasting techniques [46,48] for proactive problem detection. (g) Boxplots of the relative error over 1000 random instances of the six change patterns and combinations thereof.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we plan to increase the order of the filter to further improve its ability of trading off reaction to changes versus robustness to outliers. Finally, we plan to investigate the combination of LAF with forecasting techniques [46,48] for proactive problem detection. (g) Boxplots of the relative error over 1000 random instances of the six change patterns and combinations thereof.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A threat to external validity is the use of predefined input data patterns for the comparison of the approaches and the ability to generalize these results to common traces of realistic software systems. We have selected these inputs inline with common theory, common practice in control theory to stress the response of dynamic systems (Step, Ramp), and of filters in particular (Noisy, Periodic, Outlier), and the related approaches [14,15,37] and could observe similar patterns also in QoS data sets of web services [46] and web systems (cp. next Section VII).…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis and investigation of collected real-world QoS data of WSs presented in [46] and [47] demonstrate that, even when calling the same WS, the actual values of certain QoS attributes (e.g., response time and availability) are not identical for different service consumers because of their disparate environments and conditions. Similarly, the real-world QoS data collected and used in [107], [108], [109], and [110] demonstrate that, even for the same WS invoked by the same service consumer, the actual QoS value will vary over different calling (service invocation) times. For these two factors, dedicated prediction approaches are already being developed for forecasting real QoS values by considering different factors, such as [111], [112], [113], and [114] for the first factor and [107], [108], [109], and [110] for the second.…”
Section: Fourth Issue: Qos Analysis and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 1: White Noise Checking: The time series forecasting method is constructed based on the assumptions of the time series, which are serial dependency, normality, stationarity, and invertibility [11]. In order to ensure the time series data can be effectively characterized by time series models, it must satisfy the serial dependency over the observed time period.…”
Section: Model Of Service Ranking Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%