2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated, FPGA-based reconfigurable, low-power RFID tag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power comparisons of tag chips are ranged from several hundreds to ten-kilos of lW consumption using a commercial process [39]. Focus on power dissipation of Manchester encoder/decoder, 950 lW in Spartan-3 realization and 284-lW using 0.16 lm process were proposed [40]. In this work, the power consumption of the encoder core is estimated as only order of several ten of lW working in a higher data rate.…”
Section: Coding Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power comparisons of tag chips are ranged from several hundreds to ten-kilos of lW consumption using a commercial process [39]. Focus on power dissipation of Manchester encoder/decoder, 950 lW in Spartan-3 realization and 284-lW using 0.16 lm process were proposed [40]. In this work, the power consumption of the encoder core is estimated as only order of several ten of lW working in a higher data rate.…”
Section: Coding Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its functionality is examined both in simulations and in a measurement environment. This approach is followed for instance in the study by [35,37,57,58] for RFID tags or in [42,59] for RFID readers. Furthermore, the approach of an automatic generation of hardware modules out of highlevel descriptions, as it is common practice in chip design [60], is demonstrated on the example of encoding and decoding units in RFID [61,62].…”
Section: Rapid Prototyping Environments For Rfidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed-loop applications have mainly been adopted to comply with client mandates, where the majority of suppliers have followed the "slap-and-ship" approach, in which RFID tags are put on products before they leave a warehouse and are sent to retailers. This represents an increased cost for the supplier since it does not exploit the benefits of RFID within their facilities and usually implies the usage of proprietary solutions, thereby increasing the cost of deployment and the raising of compatibility issues among supplychain members (Stroh and Ringbeck, 2004;Jones et al, 2007). Indeed, according to Watson (2005, in Hingley et al, 2007, some of Wal-Mart's suppliers have spent an average of US$500 000 to conform with the demand to implement RFID-enabled shipments of cases and pallets.…”
Section: Justification Of Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%