2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated microscale technique for the quantitative and parallel analysis of microfiltration operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the 1 00 UEAV A cartridge performance is within 10% of the 10 00 UEAV cartridge, compared with 41% for the flat-sheet disc. Whilst the 25 mm diameter flat-sheet discs used in these experiments were smaller than the standard 47 mm discs, it was not anticipated that the smaller area would lead to an increase in the degree of variability in performance that have been reported with other small diameter discs (Chandler and Zydney, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006). This was indeed seen to be the case, as the variability in performance was relatively low and did not impact upon the performance prediction that could be made with the flat-sheet disc.…”
Section: Volume Throughput Predictions For Protein Solution Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the 1 00 UEAV A cartridge performance is within 10% of the 10 00 UEAV cartridge, compared with 41% for the flat-sheet disc. Whilst the 25 mm diameter flat-sheet discs used in these experiments were smaller than the standard 47 mm discs, it was not anticipated that the smaller area would lead to an increase in the degree of variability in performance that have been reported with other small diameter discs (Chandler and Zydney, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006). This was indeed seen to be the case, as the variability in performance was relatively low and did not impact upon the performance prediction that could be made with the flat-sheet disc.…”
Section: Volume Throughput Predictions For Protein Solution Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Other studies (Chandler and Zydney, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006) have previously shown measurable differences in the performance of membrane taken from different locations within a manufactured roll. Thus it may be expected that reduced pleat levels lead to an increase in experimental variation.…”
Section: Effect Of Number and Distribution Of Membrane Pleats On Perfmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Microwell-based methods are applicable to downstream studies for proteins and are now being published. For example, Jackson et al (2006) have examined an automated microwell-based approach to evaluating microfiltration of E. coli cells. Though a vacuum rather than pressure driven system typical of large-scale was used the predictions were useful in obtaining basic data such as specific cake resistance and the automation allowed a wide ranging study of variables.…”
Section: Microwell-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flasks, called measuring flasks, for which aeration is accomplished by applying a stream of air instead of a sterile plug, are introduced by Anderlei and Büchs [5] and so far have been used in much research [14][15][16][17]. Many researchers have been working on shake flasks to describe their different characteristics through mathematical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%