2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-1787-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EBSD Study of the Deformation of Service-Aged 316 Austenitic Steel

Abstract: Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) has been used to examine the plastic deformation of an ex-service 316 austenitic stainless steel at 297K and 823K at strain rates 3.5x10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, GROD becomes a more sensitive misorientation indicator than KAM. Githinji et al 5) also reached a similar conclusion about the sensitivity of KAM and GROD as a function of the plastic strain. Because GROD evaluates misorientation across a long distance that corresponds to the grain size, the GROD value depends on the grain size.…”
Section: Creep Curvesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, GROD becomes a more sensitive misorientation indicator than KAM. Githinji et al 5) also reached a similar conclusion about the sensitivity of KAM and GROD as a function of the plastic strain. Because GROD evaluates misorientation across a long distance that corresponds to the grain size, the GROD value depends on the grain size.…”
Section: Creep Curvesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In order to verify the role of crystallographic orientations and grain boundary characteristics in IGC resistance, another sample of the same material was solution treated at 1040 °C followed by ageing at 600 °C (1112 °F) for 1 h [35] (as the minimum temperature required to reach the austenite phase). Then, the sample was subjected to hydrogen cathodic charging with a current density of 300 mA/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical subgrain angle of 2°was used to disregard subgrain boundaries. A log-normal probability distribution was fitted to the relative frequency distribution of KAM values [28] and expressed as follows…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%