2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient parallel tree-code for the simulation of self-gravitating systems

Abstract: Abstract. We describe a parallel version of our tree-code for the simulation of self-gravitating systems in Astrophysics. It is based on a dynamic and adaptive method for the domain decomposition, which exploits the hierarchical data arrangement used by the tree-code. It shows low computational costs for the parallelization overhead -less than 4% of the total CPU-time in the tests done -because the domain decomposition is performed "on the fly" during the tree-construction and the portion of the tree that is l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the computational techniques, we adopted an N-body representation for the stars in the clusters, simulating their dynamics by means of the parallel ''treeATD'' code (Miocchi & Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2002), whose main features were also described in Paper I.…”
Section: The Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the computational techniques, we adopted an N-body representation for the stars in the clusters, simulating their dynamics by means of the parallel ''treeATD'' code (Miocchi & Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2002), whose main features were also described in Paper I.…”
Section: The Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative acceleration error is defined as δa/a ≡ |a − a D |/|a D |, here a D is the particle acceleration evaluated in the direct summation limit. The results show that for simulation S2L the relative errors in the forces are always below ∼ 3%, an upper limit which has been found to yield reasonable accuracy in various tests (Davé, Dubinski & Hernquist 1997, Springel, Yoshida & White 2001, Miocchi & Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2002.…”
Section: With 50mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Another comparison can be made with the parallel treecode developed by Miocchi & Capuzzo-Dolcetta (2002). The authors computed gravity speeds on a CRAY T3E for a Plummer distribution with N p = 128, 000 particles.…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a modern tree code is Bonsai [13] but also BRIDGE [14] which simultaneously takes advantages from both the direct and the tree approach. Another example is TreeATD (tree-code with Adaptive Tree Decomposition) developed by Miocchi and Capuzzo-Dolcetta [15]. Another kind of approximation scheme is that developed by Ahmad and Cohen [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%