1977
DOI: 10.1086/155453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An emerging flux model for the solar flare phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
291
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 659 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
291
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Flux emergence is the driver in the model of Heyvaerts et al (1977), where we can distinguish three phases: (1) new magnetic flux emerges and a current sheet forms between the old and the new flux; (2) the current sheet loses equilibrium at a critical height and turbulent resistivity causes particles acceleration and triggers chromospheric evaporation; (3) the current sheet reaches a new steady state with marginal reconnection. A requirement of this model is the pre-existence of a stable current sheet for a day or more.…”
Section: Scientific Models For Solar Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flux emergence is the driver in the model of Heyvaerts et al (1977), where we can distinguish three phases: (1) new magnetic flux emerges and a current sheet forms between the old and the new flux; (2) the current sheet loses equilibrium at a critical height and turbulent resistivity causes particles acceleration and triggers chromospheric evaporation; (3) the current sheet reaches a new steady state with marginal reconnection. A requirement of this model is the pre-existence of a stable current sheet for a day or more.…”
Section: Scientific Models For Solar Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way of reconnection, however, depends largely on the magnetic configuration. In the two-dimensional (2D) case, new magnetic fluxes emerge from beneath the photosphere and reconnect with the pre-existing, open magnetic fields of opposite polarity, resulting in hot, collimated jets and two bright lobes at the base of jets (Heyvaerts et al, 1977;Shibata et al, 1992;Yokoyama & Shibata, 1996). Such mechanism became popular and was developed in the state-of-the-art, three-dimension (3D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) numerical experiments (Moreno-Insertis et al, 2008;Moreno-Insertis & Galsgaard, 2013;Archontis & Hood, 2013;Fang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core field is directed nearly parallel to the neutral line whereas in the potential-field configuration it would be nearly orthogonal to the neutral line. This signifies that the core field is so greatly deformed from the potential field that most of its magnetic energy is free energy (e.g., Svestka 1976; Heyvaerts et al 1977;Sturrock 1980;Zirin 1988;Moore 1988;Moore and Sterling 2006). This pent-up free energy renders the core field or even the entire arcade capable of erupting.…”
Section: Isolated-arcade Eruptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%