2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
66
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis indicated that athletes and ASP lack the psychological capability to enact clean sport behaviours, due to a lack of knowledge and awareness of anti-doping rules and regulations. In line with a recent evaluation of NADO prevention initiatives (Gatterer et al, 2020), the weight of the evidence in this meta-synthesis pointed to anti-doping education as inadequate in providing athletes and ASP with the knowledge and skills to elicit clean sport behaviour. Athletes, bodybuilders, and gym users alike questioned their capability to succeed and achieve their goals without doping, and there was awareness of how to circumvent the anti-doping system amongst competitive athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis indicated that athletes and ASP lack the psychological capability to enact clean sport behaviours, due to a lack of knowledge and awareness of anti-doping rules and regulations. In line with a recent evaluation of NADO prevention initiatives (Gatterer et al, 2020), the weight of the evidence in this meta-synthesis pointed to anti-doping education as inadequate in providing athletes and ASP with the knowledge and skills to elicit clean sport behaviour. Athletes, bodybuilders, and gym users alike questioned their capability to succeed and achieve their goals without doping, and there was awareness of how to circumvent the anti-doping system amongst competitive athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, the Code outlines many other behaviours, beyond use, that would violate anti-doping rules (e.g., possession, administration, complicity) and these behaviours warrant further inquiry. Finally, there is a need for the research studies to keep pace with developments in the anti-doping field by shifting focus away from risk factors of doping to enablers of clean sport behaviours (Englar-Carlson et al, 2016;Gatterer et al, 2020;Petróczi et al, 2017). A shift in focus to clean sport behaviours is even more pressing in light of the forthcoming ISE, which focuses on developing clean sport behaviours through anti-doping education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous research, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] coaches are influential in determining whether young athletes will take banned substances to enhance their performance. However, they receive very little or no antidoping education in entry-level coaching qualifications, which tends to be focused on sport-specific and pedagogical learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 10 Additionally, some coaches who suspect their athletes of doping may not be confident in their ability to confront the athlete, 11 and other coaches may be reluctant to attend antidoping training because they do not want to miss a training session. 12 To understand coaches' views of doping further, Nicholls et al 13 interviewed 11 coaches about doping among adolescent athletes. The coaches in the study believed that vulnerable athletes would take PEDs if their coach encouraged them to do so, because they trust their coach and would be afraid to decline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation