An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks

Peterson, Bradley S.; Kane, Michael J.; Alexander, Gerianne M.; Lacadie, Cheryl; Skudlarski, Pawel; Leung, Hoi‐Chung; May, Julian; Gore, John C.

doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00054-x

Cited by 318 publications

(276 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

242

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with our hypothesis, and consistent with previous reports (Wittfoth, Buck, Fahle, & Herrmann, 2006;Liu, Banich, Jacobson, & Tanabe, 2004;Peterson et al, 2002), activation was elicited in the pre-SMA on correct IG trials which were associated with elevated error rates. This finding was corroborated by a correlation analysis between the percent signal change derived from the pre-SMA and the error slope values derived for each participant, respectively (see Figure 3, middle).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control

Forstmann¹,

Wildenberg²,

Ridderinkhof³

2008

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

181

195

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract& Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods may help in understanding processes of response capture and response inhibition in conflict tasks, such as the Simon task. However, data-driven approaches thus far have not yielded consistent insights into these processes. Here, a theory-driven approach is introduced that capitalizes on individual differences in the processes of central interest. Based on the so-called activation-suppression model, specific behavioral parameters for each individual derived from reaction time (RT) distribution analysis were computed and entered into model-based fMRI analyses. These parameters correspond closely to the processes of inappropriate location-driven response activation (capture) and the subsequent inhibition of this activation as detailed by the model. Data from 24 participants revealed activation in the pre-supplementary motor area, which covaried with the RT distribution measure of response capture. Activation in the right inferior frontal cortex was found to covary with the RT distribution measure of response inhibition. These results, which are consistent against the backdrop of the larger literature on cognitive control, could have been derived neither from the standard data-driven fMRI approach, nor from inspecting overall mean RT alone. &

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control

Forstmann¹,

Wildenberg²,

Ridderinkhof³

2008

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

181

195

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ACC activation has also been observed in various versions of the flanker task [3,[8][9][10][11][12] (Box 2), in the Simon task [13], in the global-local paradigm [14,15], and in the go/no-go paradigm [16][17][18], as well as in other response override tasks [1,[18][19][20].…”

Section: Response Overridementioning

confidence: 99%

Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update

Botvinick

Cohen

Carter

2004

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

3,145

204

2,407

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other tasks commonly used to assess conflict resolution are the Flanker, the Simon or the Stroop tasks, which in imaging studies have been shown to engage medial frontal areas including the ACC and the pre-SMA [58,59]. Conflict between competing actions has also previously implicated the pre-SMA [60][61][62].…”

Section: Conflict Resolutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theta burst magnetic stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area improves motor inhibition

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks

Cited by 318 publications

References 44 publications

Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control

Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control

Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update

Theta burst magnetic stimulation over the pre-supplementary motor area improves motor inhibition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About