An Experiment in Participative Environmental Decision Making

Abstract

The paper presents a method of participatory decision-making involving the authorities at local level, experts and the public. It studies how to solve the problems caused by the heterogeneity of the parties taking part in the decision-making process. The method builds on mutual learning and consideration among the participants following a systematic approach led by a moderator. The method was tested at a workshop simulating a real-life situation. The test case studied at the workshop was the problem of identifying the best site for a low and intermediate level radioactive waste repository among three alternatives. The learning phase was the Krško Nuclear Power Plant cooling problem. The results show that the participants were able to reach agreement on the prioritisation of the alternatives and to end up with suprisingly complex and fully reasonable decision models. We believe that this was achieved particularly due to the well defined procedure that guided the decision-making process, and the ability of all participants to see the influence of their views on the decision model.

The Role of Environmental Accidental Risk Assessment in the Process of Granting Development Consent

“…( 28‐31 ) There are Slovenian research results available on this topic too; some are directly related to the context of the EIA process. ( 32, 33 ) It is important to note, however, that the EIA process is also meant to provide information to the public about risks of environmental damage enabling open and responsible discussion among parties involved. This is especially worthwhile in cases when preset criteria of acceptable consequences are not available.…”

Multi-attribute analysis of orchard according to the integrated production concept

“…(Kontić et al, 2006). DEXi method combines the traditional multicriteria decision making methodology with the elements of expert system and machine language.…”

Strategic Environmental Considerations of Nuclear Power

“…Once the impact data are standardized, the following three methods could be used for the aggregation of results (IAEA, 2000;Kontić et al, 2006):  Weighting; weight should be assigned to each indicator on the basis of its relative importance, for instance in a comparison of human health, global environmental impacts and land occupation (land-use impacts). Sensitivity analysis of the weighting should be performed in terms of investigating the difference in final comparative assessment results due to assignment of different weight values to a particular indicator (at least three justified variations should be considered); the final amalgamation method can be weight summation.…”