An Experimental Approach to Understanding the Impacts of Monitoring Methods on Use Intentions for Autonomous Vehicle Services: Survey Evidence from Japan

Abstract

Safety guidelines for autonomous vehicles (AVs) in many regions or countries require AV service providers to have the means to communicate with vehicles and the ability to stop them safely in case of emergencies. The transition to full deployment of AV services is dependent on more advanced monitoring methods. This study uses a survey of approximately 2000 residents of Japanese cities to investigate how monitoring methods affect their intentions to use these services. In particular, the survey is designed to understand how individuals react to unattended operations and remote monitoring in road passenger services including buses and taxis; the survey includes direct questions about intentions to use autonomous buses and taxis and a stated choice experiment based on the respondents’ preferences over their current mode of transportation and autonomous taxis. The results show that monitoring methods have mixed impacts. On one hand, monitoring could affect the general acceptance of AV services. The difference in the overall resistance to using these services is particularly large between the onboard human and remote monitoring options. Individuals tend to express stronger resistance to more advanced remote monitoring. On the other hand, the stated choice results show that the effects of these monitoring factors could be less significant in the actual settings of transportation mode choices; the effects of travel cost and time factors are likely to be more significant. These results suggest that when individuals consider AVs in the context of real-world decisions, their resistance to new technologies is diminished in comparison to their responses to abstract questions.

Undercutting Transit? Exploring Potential Competition Between Automated Vehicles and Public Transportation in the United States

“…Future qualitative studies could further explore perceptions of AV attendants and the multiple roles they might be expected to fill. Some studies have already started to explore public attitudes toward different types of attendants, finding preferences for onboard attendants versus remote monitoring (65). In the meantime, some AV companies are already choosing-or may be required by state regulations-to launch their services with an onboard safety driver (66).…”

Advanced e-Call Support Based on Non-Intrusive Driver Condition Monitoring for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

“…Finally, another interesting development of detecting the human behavior when driving is applied in reference [36], where the authors propose a calibration of autonomous driving functions based on automatic emotion recognition. Similar work is presented in works [37][38][39], and other methods for non-intrusive detection of health parameters are also described in [40][41][42].…”