2012
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2012.675959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Expert Panel Approach to Assessing Potential Effects of Bull Trout Reintroduction on Federally Listed Salmonids in the Clackamas River, Oregon

Abstract: The bull trout Salvelinus confluentus is an apex predator in native fish communities in the western USA and is listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). Restoration of this species has raised concerns over its potential predatory impacts on native fish fauna. We held a five-person expert panel to help determine potential impacts of reintroducing bull trout into the Clackamas River, northwest Oregon, on the viability of four anadromous salmonid populations that are listed as threatened u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should not be a solo effort; the process typically involves a small working group that collaborates closely with additional stakeholders and domain experts-biologists, scientists, decision makers-who contribute knowledge and peer reviews (Marcot et al 2001(Marcot et al , 2006. Model building can be done through a well-organized series of workshops or panel sessions designed to ensure scientific rigor and elicit expert judgment (Johnson and Weaver 2009;Marcot et al 2012). Biologists without previous experience can consult with decision analysis experts for guidance on how to structure these workshops or find suitable decision analysis methods.…”
Section: Text Box 1 a Workhop Application Of The Bull Trout Decisiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should not be a solo effort; the process typically involves a small working group that collaborates closely with additional stakeholders and domain experts-biologists, scientists, decision makers-who contribute knowledge and peer reviews (Marcot et al 2001(Marcot et al , 2006. Model building can be done through a well-organized series of workshops or panel sessions designed to ensure scientific rigor and elicit expert judgment (Johnson and Weaver 2009;Marcot et al 2012). Biologists without previous experience can consult with decision analysis experts for guidance on how to structure these workshops or find suitable decision analysis methods.…”
Section: Text Box 1 a Workhop Application Of The Bull Trout Decisiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structured expert elicitation has been used to address a broad range of ecological topics (e.g. Grech et al, 2012;Marcot et al, 2012;McDaniels et al, 2012), including potentially dealing with uncertainty in an adaptive management context (Keith et al, 2011). This has led to its increasing recognition as a valid method for capturing and summarizing knowledge and characterizing uncertainty when empirical data on species distributions and abundances are limited or dispersed (Cooke, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the lists of threatened and endangered species grow, there is an increase in the probability of situations in which species that interact as predator and prey are both depleted. Such cases have been explored theoretically and via expert panels, particularly where predator range expansion or recovery actions could threaten prey species (e.g., Chade`s et al 2012, Marcot et al 2012. However, there have been no field-based studies explicitly quantifying relationships between endangered predator and prey populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%