An Exploratory Study of the Validity of Visual Fit Assessment From Three-Dimensional Scans

Abstract

3D scans are considered to be potentially useful visual analysis tool, but there have been few studies regarding the validity of 3D scans as a tool for visual analysis. We investigated this by comparing results from fit analyses using live models with those using 3D scans of the same models. Professionals from the apparel industry provided feedback on the process of 3D scan fit analyses and suggested ways to improve the process. Results from different areas of the body showed different levels of reliability. In the bust area, misfit and estimates on alteration amounts were the most reliable, while the waist area showed the least consistency in fit interpretation overall. The hip area was not reliable for identification of misfit, but was relatively reliable for estimates of alteration amounts. This study suggested how future studies could improve the process in terms of data organization, display and the navigation interface.

Can Virtually Trying on Apparel Help in Selecting the Correct Size?

“…Garment fit is influenced by fashion, social, and cultural norms (Petrova & Ashdown, 2012), as well as by individual preferences (Alexander, Connell, & Presley, 2005;Ashdown & O'Connell, 2006;Bye, LaBat, & Delong, 2006;Kohn & Ashdown, 1998). Garment fit is defined as the balance between the garment and the silhouette of the body (Ashdown & O'Connell, 2006;Brown & Rice, 2014;Erwin, 1974;Song & Ashdown, 2010).…”

The Relationship between Experience and Demographic Variables on Concern with Apparel Fit in Online Context

“…This might be attributed to that both designers and manufacturers do not apply standard sizing measurements. In addition to size, fit is evaluated through different attributes including posture, fabric drape, and complex body proportions (Song and Ashdown, 2010). It suggests that the information provided by retailers weather it is written, pictures, or videos, were not enough in reducing consumers' concerns.…”

“…During shopping online for apparel consumers may experience more difficulty regarding fit and size because of their inability to try on clothing before purchase. What makes the situation even more difficult is that clothing fit is determined not only by fit but other elements related to posture, and complex body proportions (Song & Ashdown, 2010). While shopping in a brick and mortar stores, consumers can physically try on garments and make visual and alive evaluation through examining the body-related information (Rosa, Garbarino & Malter, 2003).…”

“…The purpose of this exploratory study is to investigate Saudi female online apparel consumers' concern with inability to try on clothing and their concern with imagining size/fit in online context and their relationship with demographic variables and previous experience. of consumer satisfaction and apparel quality (Song & Ashdown, 2010). Brown and Rice (2001) defined apparel fit as "how well the garment conforms to the three-dimensional human body" (p. 153).…”

A Study of the Relationship between 3D Model and 3D Garment Simulation

“…One problem with all current measuring methods used to construct garment patterns is abstracting the garment shape to provide fit and comfort, but not replicate the body exactly (Song & Ashdown, 2010). While it does seem possible to create an accurate representation of the body, it is necessary to go beyond the body measurements and determine the ideal relationship between the body and the garment.…”