1967
DOI: 10.1016/0550-306x(67)80005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended table of calculated (n,2n) cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we measured only cross section for excited iso- 6 We do not include in the Table 7 mer in 117 Sn, it is possible to evaluate the value of σ g cross section for this reaction because semi-empirical formulae predict total (n, 2n) cross sections (σ g = σ tot − σ m ). The predictions of σ tot for the 118 Sn(n, 2n) 117 Sn reaction are (except that of [54]) all between 1330 and 1630 mb [26,52,53,55,58,73,74]. The mean value of total cross section is centered around (1464 ± 104) mb excluding the result of Ref.…”
Section: Sn(n 2n) 117 Sn Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we measured only cross section for excited iso- 6 We do not include in the Table 7 mer in 117 Sn, it is possible to evaluate the value of σ g cross section for this reaction because semi-empirical formulae predict total (n, 2n) cross sections (σ g = σ tot − σ m ). The predictions of σ tot for the 118 Sn(n, 2n) 117 Sn reaction are (except that of [54]) all between 1330 and 1630 mb [26,52,53,55,58,73,74]. The mean value of total cross section is centered around (1464 ± 104) mb excluding the result of Ref.…”
Section: Sn(n 2n) 117 Sn Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global behaviour of the (n, 2n) cross sections calculated using Pearlstein's semiempirical formula [1] and its comparison with experimental data was already discussed in References 2 and 3. In this work we investigate the region UR=6+_I MeV in detail.…”
Section: The Evaporation Calculations For (N 2n) Reactions At Ua =6_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy of 10-20% between experimental data and evaporation estimates was neither observed as systematic nor considered significant. At the time, most of the evaporation results were obtained by Pearlstein's semiempirical formula [1]. It has been shown recently 1-2, 3] that Pearlstein's calculations give results which are in systematic disagreement with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sum of the neutron-emission cross sections is given by ( 2) where a ne is the reaction or non-elastic cross section, an,p the (n, p) cross section which can be estimated from the pre-equilibrium model and aother the other cross sections including the (n, a), (n, r), (n, d), (n, pn), (n, an) etc. which cannot be calculated in the same for the (n, p) cross section.…”
Section: (N 2n) Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%