1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1996.543210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An HMM approach to text-prompted speaker verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Text prompted: In text prompted, speaker verification system will select a random word, read it to the called and ask the caller to repeat it exactly [22].…”
Section: Classification Of Speaker Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Text prompted: In text prompted, speaker verification system will select a random word, read it to the called and ask the caller to repeat it exactly [22].…”
Section: Classification Of Speaker Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campbell described the bias dilemma, hypothesizing that reported results will be biased low (decreased False Acceptance rates) when either excluding or allowing cohort speakers. Cohort speakers normalize the test score to remove various word effects of the utterance and have been shown to greatly improve verification accuracy [2]. This article first examines an alternative testing methodology to remove this bias from the reported %ual %or Rate (EER) or Zero Rejection Rate (ZRR) performance of a hidden Markov model speaker verification system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%