2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-006-9137-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An important but easily forgettable review: extracardiac activity in myocardial perfusion scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we strongly recommend the evaluation of PET images for previously unsuspected pathologies in daily practice, as this may eventually lead to uncovering of crucial pathologies that significantly change the patient management and prognosis. This is particularly important with the evolving diseases of the 21 st century 21 , 22 , 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we strongly recommend the evaluation of PET images for previously unsuspected pathologies in daily practice, as this may eventually lead to uncovering of crucial pathologies that significantly change the patient management and prognosis. This is particularly important with the evolving diseases of the 21 st century 21 , 22 , 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any NCF appearing suspicious for serious disease, for example, a focal lung or breast uptake suggesting malignancy, warrants direct contact with the referring physician. We must always remember that the overall well-being of the patient is advanced by not limiting interpretation of MPI exams to the heart [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of incidental extracardiac findings on cCTAs is common and the evaluation and reporting of extracardiac findings should be performed on every myocardial perfusion study [20][21][22]. In a review of the literature discussing the incidental extracardiac findings on cCTA, a total of 13 articles were found including a total of 13,995 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%