2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved metric for measuring multi-item multi-level schedule instability under rolling schedules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different measures can be used to evaluate the instability numerically (Sridharan, Berry, and Udayabhanu 1988;Kimms 1998;Pujawan 2004;Kabak and Ornek 2009). A rolling planning horizon n is often used with a specific periodicity t (cycles).…”
Section: Instability In Production Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different measures can be used to evaluate the instability numerically (Sridharan, Berry, and Udayabhanu 1988;Kimms 1998;Pujawan 2004;Kabak and Ornek 2009). A rolling planning horizon n is often used with a specific periodicity t (cycles).…”
Section: Instability In Production Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and reliability of internal operations in manufacturing companies affect the level of schedule nervousness they experience and thus the operation efficiency (Kabak & Ornek, 2009). A number of sub-factors are considered, namely, the reliability of the production system, component commonality, skills of the corresponding staff in managing planning and scheduling activities, the existence of an effective time-fencing system, and the flexibility of the scheduling system (Pujawan & Kingsman, 2000;Pujawan, 2004;Kadipasaoglu and Sridharan, 1995;Zhao & Lee, 1993;Zhao, Xie, & Jiang, 2001;Inman & Gonsalvez, 1997, Pfeiffer, Kadar, & Monostori, 2007Bayraktar, Koh, Gunnasekaran, Sari, & Tatoglu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reflected in the change cost procedure by Carlson et al (1979). The methods to evaluate nervousness from Sridharan et al (1988), Kimms (1998), Pujawan (2004) and Kabak and Ornek (2009) also considered that there is either no consequences of distant change, an equal weight, or a proportional weight. These measures are only amenable to numerical analysis.…”
Section: Measuring Systems Nervousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%