2020
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.571629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Polymerase Cross-Linking Spiral Reaction Assay for Rapid Diagnostic of Canine Parvovirus 2 Infection

Abstract: With increasing complications of canine parvovirus infection cases, disease diagnosis and treatment have become more difficult. In this study, specificity primers for the conserved region of the VP2 gene of canine parvovirus 2 (CPV-2) were synthesized and evaluated. An improved polymerase cross-linking spiral reaction (PCLSR) method for early and rapid diagnosis of CPV-2 was established. The results showed that the amplification reaction was optimal when run at 62 • C for 50 min and could be used to detect CPV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSR was not only sensitive but also rapid, already giving results after 30 min of incubation. In most reports, the minimum detection time by PSR was 45–60 min (Ashmi et al ., 2021; Das et al ., 2018; Dutta et al ., 2019; Gupta et al ., 2017; Malla et al ., 2018; Milton et al ., 2021; Xu et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…PSR was not only sensitive but also rapid, already giving results after 30 min of incubation. In most reports, the minimum detection time by PSR was 45–60 min (Ashmi et al ., 2021; Das et al ., 2018; Dutta et al ., 2019; Gupta et al ., 2017; Malla et al ., 2018; Milton et al ., 2021; Xu et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high specificity reported here was probably because of highly specific primers for the A. pleuropneumoniae apxIVA gene (Zhou et al ., 2008). Similar levels of sensitivity of real‐time PCR and PSR have also been reported by other workers (Ashmi et al ., 2021; Das et al ., 2018; Gupta et al ., 2017; Malla et al ., 2018; Milton et al ., 2021; Xu et al ., 2020). And the technology is ten times more sensitive compared to traditional PCR (Milton et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations