2017
DOI: 10.1561/104.00000046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Version of the Volume-Synchronized Probability of Informed Trading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also explained the VPIN metric is sometimes unexpectedly correlated with other usual ones (such as VIX or RV) [9] [10]. Moreover, it has been shown [14] [15] that the VPIN does not approximate the PIN, as the PIN was built on a time-clock theoretical framework, and the VPIN with a volume-clock paradigm. In this study, we propose another way to estimate the PIN within its original time-clock framework.…”
Section: Probability Of Informed Trading (Pin) a High Value Of The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have also explained the VPIN metric is sometimes unexpectedly correlated with other usual ones (such as VIX or RV) [9] [10]. Moreover, it has been shown [14] [15] that the VPIN does not approximate the PIN, as the PIN was built on a time-clock theoretical framework, and the VPIN with a volume-clock paradigm. In this study, we propose another way to estimate the PIN within its original time-clock framework.…”
Section: Probability Of Informed Trading (Pin) a High Value Of The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Now, we synthetise and refer to the great ideas of the proof of Kin and Le [14]. Remark first the following:…”
Section: A New Computation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also explained that VPIN metric is sometimes unexpectedly correlated with other usual ones (such as VIX or RV) [7,8]. More recently, it has been shown theoretically that the volume-clock paradigm of VPIN framework does not enable to really approximate fully the PIN value, although the proposed formula is close [15,16].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%