2017
DOI: 10.2208/jscejam.73.i_363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improvement of Loading Criterion for Stress Calculation Based on Return-Mapping Scheme for Extended Subloading Surface Plasticity Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was used by Hashiguchi [30], Hashiguchi and Ueno [39], Iguchi et al [45][46][47], etc., wherê n c of ðc; bÞ oc 0 of ðc; bÞ oc ð26Þ which is the normalized outward-normal of the elastic-core surface at the current elastic-core c. It cannot be applicable to the generic deformation behavior, since it depends only on the unit outward-normal tensors n andn c independent of the size and the shape of the normal-yield surface as seen in the right-hand side of Eq. ( 25).…”
Section: Evolution Rule Of Elastic-corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…was used by Hashiguchi [30], Hashiguchi and Ueno [39], Iguchi et al [45][46][47], etc., wherê n c of ðc; bÞ oc 0 of ðc; bÞ oc ð26Þ which is the normalized outward-normal of the elastic-core surface at the current elastic-core c. It cannot be applicable to the generic deformation behavior, since it depends only on the unit outward-normal tensors n andn c independent of the size and the shape of the normal-yield surface as seen in the right-hand side of Eq. ( 25).…”
Section: Evolution Rule Of Elastic-corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the loading/unloading criterion (167), merely based on the elastic trial state, may make an incorrect judgment. To overcome this drawback, improved methods of loading/unloading judgment have been developed, 108,109 while not yet implemented to the analysis code used in this study.…”
Section: Elastic Predictor and Loading/unloading Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a particular loading criterion after the elastic trial step and a particular calculation procedure in the initiation of plastic corrector step are required in the return-mapping projection for the subloading surface model. This fact has not been recognized in the past formulations [2,16,28,33,46,90] and the inexact loading criterions after the elastic trial step have been shown in the past [32,49]. The closet point projection in the return-mapping method for the extended subloading surface model was proposed first by Anjiki et al [2] and subsequently Iguchi et al [49] in the multiplicative decomposition and followed the results of Anjiki et al [2] later by Fincato and Tsutsumi [16].…”
Section: Loading Criterion In Return-mapping For Subloading Surface Mmentioning
confidence: 99%