An in vitro comparative evaluation of volume of removed dentin, canal transportation, and centering ratio of 2Shape, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold files using cone-beam computed tomography

Singh, Shalini; Abdul, Muqthadir Siddiqui Mohammed; Sharma, Utsav; Sainudeen, Shan; Jain, Chayan; Kalliath, Jacob Tony

doi:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_444_18

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 8 ] The K3 XF’s moderate canal area expansion matches its design, which prioritizes flexibility and cyclic fatigue over dentin removal. [ 9 10 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides high-resolution, three-dimensional root canal imaging for accurate shape evaluation. [ 10 ] Thus, this CBCT study compared the centering, canal transportation, and root canal area increase of the XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM, and K3 XF file systems. This research will help endodontists choose the best rotary file system for clinical situations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Compare the Centering Ability, Canal Transportation and Root Canal Area Increase of XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM and K3 XF File System by using Cone Beam: An Original Research

Vinodhini,

Baig,

Attur

et al. 2024

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), this study compared three rotary file systems—XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM, and K3 XF—for centering, canal transportation, and root canal area growth. Materials and Methods: The rotating file system randomly separated 60 removed human mandibular molars into three groups (n = 20). Manufacturer-recommended root canal instrumentation was done. Specialized software examined pre- and post-instrumentation CBCT scans. Centering ability was measured by canal transportation and root canal area expansion at different levels from the apex. Results: The Hyflex CM file system had the best centering and the least canal transit at all levels (P < 0.05). XP Endoshaper increased the root canal area the most (P < 0.05). The K3 XF file system had average centering and canal transfer results. Conclusion: The Hyflex CM system centered well, whereas the XP Endoshaper system increased the root canal area the most. The clinical context and therapeutic goals should determine the rotating file system.

show abstract

“…[ 8 ] The K3 XF’s moderate canal area expansion matches its design, which prioritizes flexibility and cyclic fatigue over dentin removal. [ 9 10 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compare the Centering Ability, Canal Transportation and Root Canal Area Increase of XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM and K3 XF File System by using Cone Beam: An Original Research

Vinodhini,

Baig,

Attur

et al. 2024

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the present study, Apical preparation was limited to size 25, i.e., the choice of the size of the le of each system was based on the fact that with apical preparation larger than size 25, the measurement of apical transportion also tends to increase [ 41]. Thus, consequently, higher apical transport values would be obtained, bringing a bias to the research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Apical transportation induced by reciprocating files in removal of GuttaCore and single- cone from curved root canals: A micro-CT analysis

Hassan

Ibrahim

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Endodontic instruments tend to diverge from the long axis of root canal during preparation. This tendency increases with increasing canal curvature and retreatment cases. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the apical transportation induced by different reciprocating single file systems in curved canals obturated with GuttaCore and single-cone obturation techniques using microcomputed tomography. Materials and methods: Sixty-four mandibular molar teeth with root canal systems that have two independent severely curved canals in the mesial root have been chosen for the current study. The root canals have been instrumented with WaveOne Gold primary file and obturated by Single-cone and GuttaCore obturation techniques. First micro-CT scan has been taken and the samples have been subdivided into 4 groups for each obturation technique (n=16 canals each group) according to the retreatment system: Group R: Reciproc (R25 file), group RB: Reciproc Blue (R25 file), group WO: WaveOne (Primary file 25) and group WOG: WaveOne Gold (Primary file 25). After the retreatment procedures, the second micro-CT scan has been taken and then the apical transportation at 2, 3 and 4 mm from the apex were calculated. Results: Apical transportation caused by Reciproc and WaveOne groups was significantly higher than the Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold groups. Conclusion: Under the circumstances of the current study, Reciproc and WaveOne files caused higher apical transportation than the Reciporc Blue and WaveOne Gold files. The lowest apical transportation occurred at 2 mm from the apex. Clinically relevant: The use of Reciproc blue and WaveOne Gold files can be considered safer in the removal of GuttaCore and single-cone obturation materials

show abstract

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals

Shi

Zhou

Jie

et al. 2022

Journal of Dental Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/purpose Gold metal technology improves flexibility and the resistance to cyclic fatigue of the endodontic mechanical files. This study compared the performance of ProTaper Gold (PTG) multiple file system and WaveOne Gold (WOG) single file system in simulated S-shaped root canals, which represents one of the most challenging root canal morphology. Materials and methods Forty S-shaped canals (n = 20 canals/per group) in resin blocks were instrumented to an apical size of 0.25 mm using PTG and WOG Primary, respectively. The total amount of resin removal, canal transportation, centering ratio, and the degree of canal straightening were measured in Photoshop CS6 software. Statistical analysis was performed by using Mann–Whitney U-test ( α = .05). Results None of the files fractured during the instrumentation. The WOG group removed significantly less amount of resin at 0, 3, 6, 7 and 9 mm from the apex ( P < .05). The WOG group remained more centered in canals at 0 mm from the apex ( P < .05). The PTG group showed a better centering ability and less canal transportation at 4, 5 and 6 mm from the apex ( P < .05). In the coronal curvature portion, the use of WOG Primary significantly decreased curvature angle and increased radius compared with PTG instruments ( P < .05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the apical curvature angle and radius change ( P > .05). Conclusion The WOG Primary file has a less aggressive dentin cutting and more centered apical preparation. The PTG system is more advantageous in shaping the coronal curvature of S-shaped canal.

show abstract

An in vitro comparative evaluation of volume of removed dentin, canal transportation, and centering ratio of 2Shape, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold files using cone-beam computed tomography

Cited by 11 publications

References 11 publications

Compare the Centering Ability, Canal Transportation and Root Canal Area Increase of XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM and K3 XF File System by using Cone Beam: An Original Research

Compare the Centering Ability, Canal Transportation and Root Canal Area Increase of XP Endoshaper, Hyflex CM and K3 XF File System by using Cone Beam: An Original Research

Apical transportation induced by reciprocating files in removal of GuttaCore and single- cone from curved root canals: A micro-CT analysis

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About