H ip instability remains one of the most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Approximately 22.5% of revision THAs and 33% of acetabular revisions are due to dislocations. 1 Numerous risk factors, including implant design, surgical approach, and prior hip surgery, have been associated with dislocation. However, incorrect orientation of the acetabular component is the most important factor predisposing patients to hip instability. 2 Acetabular component orientation significantly affects wear and osteolysis, acetabular migration, impingement, and the risk of dislocation in patients undergoing THA. 3-6 In 1978, Lewinnek et al 7 introduced a "safe zone" for the optimal orientation of the acetabular component in THA. A dislocation rate of 6.1% occurred for implants outside the safe range (5° to 25° anteversion and 30° to 50° inclination) as opposed to 1.5% for those within range. More recently, Callanan et al 8 suggested a "modified safe zone" (5° to 25° version and 30° to 45° inclination) for cup placement to take into account the use of hard-on-hard bearing surfaces. 9 High angles of inclination and highly anteverted cups have been shown to be correlated with higher rates of anterior and recurrent dislocations. 10 Cup malposition is also linked to higher rates