1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00237-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In Vivo Method for Measuring the Mechanical Properties of the Skin Using Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, mildly photoaged skin appears roughened and deeply wrinkled and is characterised histologically by the loss of fibrillin microfibrils (Watson et al 1999) and fibulin (Kadoya et al 2005) from the papillary dermis. In severely photoaged skin, however, abundant deposits of highly disorganised, elastic fibre material are distributed throughout the dermis (Warren et al 1991;Watson et al 2001;Werth et al 1996;Yaar and Gilchrest 2007) Early attempts to quantify the effects of ageing on the mechanical properties of skin were hampered by: the use of terminology which was open to misinterpretation (Doubal and Klemera 2002), the diversity of both mechanical tests (Diridollou et al 1998;Rodrigues 2001) and anatomical sites (Escoffier et al 1989), and most importantly by the heterogeneity and anisotropy of the skin layers themselves (Diridollou et al 1998;Pierard 1999). The mechanical response of skin to the application of tensile and torsional forces and to deformations induced by indentation and suction have all been reported in the literature (see Rodrigues 2001 for an excellent review).…”
Section: Cutaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, mildly photoaged skin appears roughened and deeply wrinkled and is characterised histologically by the loss of fibrillin microfibrils (Watson et al 1999) and fibulin (Kadoya et al 2005) from the papillary dermis. In severely photoaged skin, however, abundant deposits of highly disorganised, elastic fibre material are distributed throughout the dermis (Warren et al 1991;Watson et al 2001;Werth et al 1996;Yaar and Gilchrest 2007) Early attempts to quantify the effects of ageing on the mechanical properties of skin were hampered by: the use of terminology which was open to misinterpretation (Doubal and Klemera 2002), the diversity of both mechanical tests (Diridollou et al 1998;Rodrigues 2001) and anatomical sites (Escoffier et al 1989), and most importantly by the heterogeneity and anisotropy of the skin layers themselves (Diridollou et al 1998;Pierard 1999). The mechanical response of skin to the application of tensile and torsional forces and to deformations induced by indentation and suction have all been reported in the literature (see Rodrigues 2001 for an excellent review).…”
Section: Cutaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4c) are perhaps the most widely used (Diridollou et al 1999;Pierard 1999;Rodrigues 2001;Smalls et al 2006;Takema and Imokawa 1998;Takema et al 1994). Diridollou and co-workers suggest that this technique enables the measurement of mechanical responses which originate primarily from the dermis rather than subcutaneous structures (Diridollou et al 1998). Commercially developed devices include the Cutometer, which measures skin deformations optically, and the Dermaflex A, which measures vertical skin displacements by changes in capacitance (Diridollou et al 1998;Smalls et al 2006 biomechanical properties measured by these techniques requires quantitation of skin thickness.…”
Section: Cutaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Enfoque especial é dado às alterações que o envelhecimento provoca na pele, como a flacidez, o enrugamento, a desidratação e a perda de elasticidade cutânea. A importância da manutenção destas propriedades da pele provém da ação que esta exerce, por exemplo, quando exposta à traumas mecânicos, ou seja, fricção, impacto e pressão (Edwards, Marks, 1995;Diridollou et al, 1998;Fthenakis et al, 1991).…”
Section: Propriedades Mecânicas Da Peleunclassified
“…Mechanical properties reported using these techniques vary widely. Values for simple parameters, such as the Young's modulus, have varied by over 3 orders of magnitude [19]. Variations in such estimates may arise from the choice of spatial and frequency ranges over which the skin is perturbed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%