An informative nursing intervention for families of patients admitted to the intensive care unit regarding the satisfaction of their needs: The INFOUCI study

Rodríguez-Huerta, María Dolores; Álvarez-Pol, María; Fernández-Catalán, Marta Luz; Fernández-Vadillo, Rebeca; Martín‐Rodríguez, María del Mar; Quicios-Dorado, Begoña; Díez‐Fernández, Ana

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2019.102755

Cited by 13 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The present review included a total of 15 studies ( Table 2 ), with 10 of these being quantitative ( Bishop et al., 2013 ; Hanley and Piazza, 2012 ; Huynh et al., 2017 ; Knapp et al., 2012; Jacobowski et al., 2020; Rodriguez-Huerta et al., 2019 ; Shelton et al., 2010 ; Weber et al., 2019; White et al., 2018 ; Wu et al., 2016 ), four qualitative ( Frisman et al., 2018 ; Johansson et al., 2018 ; Naef et al., 2020 ; Nielsen et al., 2019 ) and one mixed method study ( White et al., 2012 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Main results: the intervention showed small effect sizes on distancing ( Hedges’ g = 0.4) and acceptance of responsibility ( Hedges’ g = 0.1). 9 out of 9 questions (High quality) Rodriguez-Huerta et al. (2019) , Spain To evaluate whether an informative intervention by nursing professionals through Short Message Service (SMS) improved patients’ family members’ satisfaction with the intensive care experience.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the identified studies, 10 were conducted in the United States, two were performed in Sweden ( Frisman et al., 2018 ; Johansson et al., 2018 ), while Denmark ( Nielsen et al., 2019 ), Spain ( Rodriguez-Huerta et a., 2019 ) and Switzerland ( Naef et al., 2020 ) were covered in one study each.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the nine quasi-experimental studies, three studies ( Bishop et al., 2013 ; Huynh et al., 2017 ; Wu et al., 2016 ) used the before and after approach. A further two studies ( Rodriguez-Huerta et al., 2019 ; White et al., 2018 ) were randomized controlled trials.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The total quality assessment score of each study was used to stratify evidence from high to low quality. Most studies ( n = 9) ( Frisman et al., 2018 ; Huynh et al., 2017 ; ( Johansson et al., 2018 ); Knapp et al., 2013 ; Jacobowski et al., 2010 ; Naef et al., al.,2020 ; Nielsen et al., 2019 ; Rodriguez-Huerta et al.,2019 ; Shelton et al., 2010 ) were classified as high quality. Two studies ( Bishop et al., 2013 ; Hanley and Piazza, 2012 ) were classified as low quality and four ( Weber et al., 2018 ; White et al., 2012 , 2018 ; Wu et al., 2016 ) were classified as moderate quality.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

Kiwanuka

Sak‐Dankosky

Alemayehu

et al. 2022

International Journal of Nursing Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the consequences of a patient's admission to critical care settings, causing families to face more psychosocial issues than in previous years. Thus, nurses and other clinicians need to keep abreast of interventions that support the families of critical care patients. Objective To provide evidence of nurse-led family interventions and their family outcomes in adult critical care settings. Design A mixed method systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. Data sources The search included both a screen of relevant databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library) and the screening of citations in relevant articles. Studies published in the English language between January 2010 and October 2020 were considered. The final database searches were performed on 20 October 2020. Methods Screening and eligibility assessment were conducted using the Rayyan software. Studies describing the family outcomes of nurse-led interventions in adult critical care settings through either qualitative or quantitative methods were included, i.e., the mixed method synthesis permitted the inclusion of either qualitative or quantitative findings. Article quality was evaluated by three authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. Findings A total of 15 studies – two trials, eight quasi-experimental studies, four qualitative, and one mixed method met the inclusion criteria. The described interventions were organized into five categories: educational/informational; family involvement in care; diary; communication; and bundled interventions. These categories varied in terms of elements, delivery, and family outcomes. Nurse-led interventions that resulted in small to medium improvements in family outcomes included educational interventions with digital storytelling, a bundled approach, informational nursing interventions, and nurse-driven emotional support. The included studies ( n = 2) that investigated family rounds in the ICU reported that this approach did not noticeably influence family outcomes. Conclusion The differences in the intervention elements, tools, and outcomes evaluated in this review reflect the diversity of family needs, and that numerous interventions have already been developed to promote family health in critical care settings. The evidence suggests that interdisciplinary nurse-led family interventions can improve family outcomes. Tweetable abstract: Interprofessional nurse-led family interventions draw on diverse approaches and improve family outcomes in adult critical care settings

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

Kiwanuka

Sak‐Dankosky

Alemayehu

et al. 2022

International Journal of Nursing Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context – A systematic review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To examine the content, theoretical frameworks and effectiveness of nursing interventions utilizing patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design A systematic review and narrative synthesis following the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis checklist. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SweMed and Cochrane controlled trials register (CENTRAL) databases for studies evaluating interventions primarily delivered by nurses in the ICU. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias. Results Twenty‐two studies were included, whereas only seven studies used a theoretical framework. The interventions were heterogeneous in content, duration and choice of PROMs. Outcomes were related to covering patients' and families' basic needs, described by Henderson as essential functions of nursing. Several studies reported positive intervention effects, and nurses' communication and psychosocial care were considered essential components of nursing interventions in the ICU.

show abstract

A systematic review on the effect of telehealth communication with intensive care unit families on patient and family outcomes

Crossfield,

Ozavci,

Digby

et al. 2024

Australian Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An informative nursing intervention for families of patients admitted to the intensive care unit regarding the satisfaction of their needs: The INFOUCI study

Cited by 13 publications

References 28 publications

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context – A systematic review

A systematic review on the effect of telehealth communication with intensive care unit families on patient and family outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About