1999
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.1999010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Framework for Strategic Information Systems Planning and Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Pant and Hsu (1999) contended, owing to the complexity of the IS/ IT strategic planning process and uniqueness of individual organizations, no best method of tackling the IS/IT strategic planning problems exists. Existing models and frameworks all have their own specific aims (Min et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Pant and Hsu (1999) contended, owing to the complexity of the IS/ IT strategic planning process and uniqueness of individual organizations, no best method of tackling the IS/IT strategic planning problems exists. Existing models and frameworks all have their own specific aims (Min et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers have proposed various frameworks for improving the effectiveness of IS/IT strategic planning (Mentzas, 1997;Doherty et al, 1999;Min et al, 1999;Pant and Hsu, 1999) and have examined various strategic IS/IT planning issues by survey studies, for example, evaluating effectiveness of IS/IT planning (Premkumar and King, 1994), identifying ISSP prescriptions (Lederer and Sethi, 1996) and profiles (Segars and Grover, 1999), determining factors of alignment between business planning and IS planning (Teo and King, 1997), examining relationships between planning sophistication and IS success (Sabherwal, 1999) and assessing the usefulness of strategic IS/IT plans (Teo and Ang, 2000). Additionally, other researchers have undertaken related case studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding impact methodologies, Porter (1984) analysed the fundamental importance of IS in relation to the company's value chain, creating the value chain analysis, while Rockard (1979) analysed the introduction of information technologies in the early stages to provide a realistic assessment of the contribution of Information Systems to the organisation developing the method. Pant & Hsu (1999) studied the SISP methodologies and developed an integrated framework for the development and design of information systems. Their comparative evaluation for SISP methodologies is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Strategic Management Of Information Systems and Economic Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of Strategic Alignment Model, or SAM) of Henderson and Venkatraman (1992), has been viewed as the most widely accepted, most widely implemented in practice, and most widely referenced in many studies (e.g. Pant and Hsu 1999;Tallon et al 2000).…”
Section: Literature Review Alignment Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%