2013
DOI: 10.1186/2210-4690-3-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated fuzzy approach for evaluating remanufacturing alternatives of a product design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors chose to integrate multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in order to be able to combine different indicators into one aggregated result, deriving weights for the respective indicators, and even translate qualitative information into quantitative metrics [48][49][50][51][52]. In order to determine weights, researchers usually applied fuzzy evaluation methods, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) or a combination of those to translate qualitative evaluations of experts into metrics [48][49][50][51]53].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors chose to integrate multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in order to be able to combine different indicators into one aggregated result, deriving weights for the respective indicators, and even translate qualitative information into quantitative metrics [48][49][50][51][52]. In order to determine weights, researchers usually applied fuzzy evaluation methods, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) or a combination of those to translate qualitative evaluations of experts into metrics [48][49][50][51]53].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine weights, researchers usually applied fuzzy evaluation methods, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) or a combination of those to translate qualitative evaluations of experts into metrics [48][49][50][51]53]. Additional methods like TOPSIS or VIKOR were then used to either determine distance to target [50] or the best alternative [51]. Ostermeyer et al [54] dealt with the multi-criteria approach using Pareto optimization together with the application of LCC + LCA and defined more than 700 scenarios out of which the preferred option was identified using the Pareto optimal approach.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current approach will guide analysis of factors necessary for the company to align into use of in-house technology, outsource technology, and or decide on manual operations. Among others, some factors mentioned are (i) flexibility, investment cost, and operating expenses [47][48][49][50]; (ii) market, competitiveness, capability, technical, and environmental issues [51][52][53]; (iii) time, cost, quality, service, and resources [19,49,50]; and (iv) management, regulatory, economic, and financial issues [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: The Structured Methodology For Selection Of Remanufacturing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of land resource assessment, a fuzzy set function (a continuous basis) is commonly used to undertake a CF technique (Baja et al, 2002;Burrough, 1989). Fuzzy set functions are also often used for other than land resources assessment areas, as done by Chen et al (2010), Chiclana et al (2007), Nardi and Nazori (2012), Mangaraj and Das (2008), Srivastava et al (2013), Vucetic and Simonovic (2013), Wang and Chan (2013), and Zhang et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%