An Integrated Multi-Criteria and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Establishing the Transport Plan of Intercity Trains

Abstract

The development of the transport plan must take into account various criteria impacting the transport process. The main objective of the study is to propose an integrated approach to determine the transport plan of passenger trains. The methodology consists of five steps. In the first step, the criteria for optimization of the transport plan were defined. In the second step, variants of the transport plan were formulated. In the third step, the weights of the criteria are determined by applying the step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (SWARA) multi-criteria method. The multi-objective optimization was conducted in the fourth step. The following multi-objective optimization approaches were used and compared: weighted sum method (WSM), compromise programming method (CP), and the epsilon–constraint method (EC). The study proposes a modified epsilon–constraint method (MEC) by applying normalization of each objective function according to the maximal value of the solution by individual optimization for each objective function, and hybrid methods: hybrid WSM and EC, hybrid WSM and MEC, hybrid CP and EC, and Hybrid CP and MEC. The impact of the variation of passenger flows on the choice of an optimal transport plan was studied in the fifth step. The Laplace’s criterion, Hurwitz’s criterion, and Savage’s criterion were applied to come to a decision. The approbation of the methodology was demonstrated through the case study of Bulgaria’s railway network. Suitable variant of transport plan is proposed.

Development of a Generic Decision Tree for the Integration of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) Methods under Uncertainty to Facilitate Sustainability Assessment: A Methodical Review

“…The a posteriori method integrates DMs' preferences after obtaining Pareto-optimal solutions from the MOO algorithms [51]. Several recent studies combined MOO and MCDM methods, including optimal planning for electric vehicle charging stations [52], polymer extrusion problems [53], chemical engineering processes [54], reservoir operation [55], developing transport plans [56], etc. Padhye and Deb [57] used two MOO methods, Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA)-II and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and three MCDM methods (marginal utility method, aspiration point method, and the L 2 metric method) for the selective laser sintering process.…”

Sustainability of Railway Undertaking Services with Lean Philosophy in Risk Management—Case Study

“…The timetable of a train is like a document which establishes a time position of the train in a specific line section and defines travelling time for each train [14]. Based on Stoilov's thoughts, planning must consider various criteria of the transport process [65]. If the travelling time is exceeded, then the passenger can be compensated for a train delay.…”

Multi‐parameter optimization of performance and economic viability of Ferris wheel wind turbine for low wind speed regions in Africa

“…In engineering multi‐parameter optimization, the designers are interested in finding one or more optimum solutions in the light of two or more objective functions to identify a set of trade‐off solutions [8]. A multi‐objective optimization allows for maximization or minimization of a set of objective functions [9, 10] and is very useful in identifying the minimum cost of energy and the maximum annual energy production (AEP) early in the design process [8].…”