2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated SWOT based fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for digital transformation strategy analysis in airline industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) [123] Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) [123] Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [153,190-195] [196-198] Autoencoder [199] Fuzzy Logic [200] [117,201,202] [ [203][204][205][206][207] Logistic Regression [131,150] [126,208] Bayesian Network [30,[209][210][211] Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) [125,163,251] Graph-Theoretic Clustering [253] Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [254] Markov Decision Process (MDP) [78,235,240,255] Not referenced [256,257] [258]…”
Section: Categorisation Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) [123] Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) [123] Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [153,190-195] [196-198] Autoencoder [199] Fuzzy Logic [200] [117,201,202] [ [203][204][205][206][207] Logistic Regression [131,150] [126,208] Bayesian Network [30,[209][210][211] Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) [125,163,251] Graph-Theoretic Clustering [253] Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [254] Markov Decision Process (MDP) [78,235,240,255] Not referenced [256,257] [258]…”
Section: Categorisation Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, several MCDM methods have been proposed, each with its advantages and limitations [56]. Among them, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has the advantages of simplicity of application, repeatability, and consistency of results [57], and for that reason, it gained recognition, and currently is one of the most employed MCDM techniques by academics, and by industry in general [58][59][60]. The AHP method was developed by Saaty [61] and its approach is based on the fragmentation of the decision process into smaller parts, constituting a hierarchical system of objectives, metrics, and scenarios [62][63][64].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If CR < 0.10, the degree of consistency is considered satisfactory. Otherwise, evaluations are inconsistent, and the rating a ij in the pairwise comparison matrix must be revised to remove inconsistency [57,59,63,66,85,86].…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fahp) Multicriteria Analys...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different fuzzy MCDM methods, but it is difficult to determine the best or most suitable one for a practical issue [55]. The proposed hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for the comprehensive performance evaluation of pumped storage power stations in this paper is compared with the recently proposed MCDM method, namely fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%