An intelligent benchmark-based design for environment system for derivative electronic product development

Chiang, Tzu-An; Roy, Rajkumar

doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.014

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…First, indices that appear to benchmark the performance of systems were identified during the indicator classification exercise. Whilst not the focus of the work reported herein, benchmarking and systems comparison are argued to be important activities for realizing improvements in sustainability performance [Pascual and Boks, ; Wever et al., ; Ulgiati et al., ; Chiang and Roy, ]. For instance, Boks and Stevels [: 131] describe product environmental benchmarking as a “powerful tool,” highlighting its role in improving the environmental performance of products and raising awareness of environmental considerations in manufacturing organizations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The S-Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we present the first generic framework for selecting comprehensive material/energetic sustainability performance indicators (SPIs) for technical systems: the S-Cycle Performance Matrix (SCPMatrix). This novel matrix is comprised of 6 generic sustainability goals, 11 SPI archetypes, and 23 corresponding metrics identified from our previously developed model of technical system sustainability (the S-Cycle), and is intended to support decision makers in meeting three identified criteria for comprehensive SPI sets: (C1) inclusion of indicators measuring performance at all relevant scales; (C2) inclusion of efficiency and effectiveness indicators; and (C3) coverage of all system sustainability goals. We evaluated the matrix by interpreting and classifying 324 indicators currently applied to assess technical system sustainability performance in the literature, with 94.1% found to be fully classifiable with respect to the proposed goals and SPI archetypes following several refinements. The matrix is applicable to different systems, and may be considered to facilitate the selection of a holistic set of SPIs from different sources and evaluation approaches. Thus, it addresses a need for consistent yet flexible guidance on how to comprehensively assess technical system sustainability performance, mirroring generic guidelines on organizational SPI selection widely available through several international initiatives. In addition to industrial evaluation of the S-CPMatrix, four avenues for future research are proposed: (i) use of the matrix for systems comparison/benchmarking; (ii) further investigation of unsupported metrics; (iii) the nature and measurement of contaminants; and (iv) assessing the comprehensiveness of current SPI sets for technical systems.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The S-Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A life cycle planning framework for innovative eco-design was put forward [23], where the framework combined TRIZ, design uncertainty evaluation, and a product eco-efficiency indicator. A DFE methodology combining back propagation neural networks (BPNN), data envelopment analysis (DEA) and suggestions for improvement tools was proposed [24] to be served as an eco-innovation methodology. Also, an inventive problem solving algorithm based LCE (life cycle engineering) model for innovative product eco-design was put forward [25].…”

Section: ) Innovative Eco-design Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of environmentally conscious product design

Li¹,

Gómez²,

Pehlken³

2015

Advances in Computer Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Recently environmentally conscious product design (ECPD) is highlighted by research community, because of the global conscious about low carbon emission and sustainable development. ECPD cares about the environmental, social and economic impacts of products during their life cycle phases, with the destination to achieve product life cycle design for sustainability. Furthermore, information and communication technologies are important for the implementation of computer-aided eco-design. The theories, methods, software tools about ECPD during 2005 to 2015 were reviewed in this work. Five most related aspects including product eco-design, design for disassembly (DFD), design for recycling (DFR), material selection (MS), and eco-design software tools were analyzed as related categories. Eco-impact assessment was found to be a pre-step in ECPD followed by product eco-innovation. DFD, DFR, and MS helped to improve the energy efficiency and eco-friendliness of products. Eco-design software tools are focusing on CAD-integration, web-based and knowledge base-based characteristics. More eco-design software tools will be developed in specific industries and to handling products with composite materials.Keywords-product eco-design; design for sustainability (D4S); eco-design software tools; state-of-the-art; eco-friendly produts

show abstract

“…Podem ajudar no controle do uso de recursos durante o processo produtivo ou também no projeto do produto (ANDRIANKAJA et al, 2015;HOUE;GRABOT, 2009;ZHANG et al, 2011;CHIANG;ROY, 2012;FIKSEL, 2009). A integração de aspectos ambientais em produtos pode minimizar os riscos de emissões difundidas durante a produção, consumo e descarte (BAUMANN; BOONS; BRAGD, 2002;DANGELICO;PONTRANDOLFO, 2010).…”

unclassified

“…Diferente de outras práticas de gestão ambiental, o DfE analisa todas as fases do ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto com o objetivo de minimizar o impacto ambiental (CHARTER;TISCHNER, 2001;FIKSEL, 1997;ZHANG et al, 2011;CHIANG;ROY, 2012). Também, como aplicado no projeto de produto, se diferencia de projetos de produto tradicionais, onde são produtivistas e não consideram o impacto no meio ambiente (GIANNETTI; ALMEIDA, 2006).…”

unclassified

Panorama do design for environment: uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática

Junior

Mendes

2018

Revista PO: R. Eletr. de Eng. de Produção e Correlatas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: Esta pesquisa é um estudo exploratório apresentando o Design for Environment -DfE como uma prática de gestão ambiental em Ecologia Industrial no ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto. O DfE analisa todas as etapas do ciclo de vida de um produto: desenvolvimento, fabricação, uso e disposição final propondo alterações no projeto, de forma a minimizar o impacto ambiental do produto. Com o intuito de analisar a literatura sobre o tema, esta pesquisa conduz uma Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática -RBS sobre o DfE e práticas relacionadas. A RBS contempla uma etapa de planejamento, onde são definidos os objetivos da pesquisa, conceitos para inclusão e exclusão dos trabalhos a serem analisados, os trabalhos primários identificados e os materiais e métodos. A etapa seguinte é denominada processamento, que resulta mapeamento dos trabalhos. Nesta etapa, a análise dos objetivos dos artigos permitiu observar a convergência para temas relacionados à qualidade, inovação, estratégia, melhoria ambiental, avaliação ambiental, ferramenta, integração, setor ou produto específico estudado. A terceira etapa resultados, classifica os artigos por autoria e foco de pesquisa. Por fim esses artigos foram analisados e um conjunto de práticas relacionadas ao DfE disponíveis na literatura, foram classificadas de acordo com as etapas do ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto.Palavras-chave: Gestão ambiental. RBS. DfE. Ciclo de desenvolvimento do produto. Práticas DfE. Abstract:This research is an exploratory study presenting the Design for Environment -DfE as an environmental management practice in Industrial Ecology in the product development cycle. DfE analyzes all stages of the product life cycle: development, manufacturing, use and final disposal proposing changes in the design, to minimize the environmental impact of the product. To analyze the literature on the subject, this research conducts a Systematic Bibliographic Review -RBS on DfE and identifies related practices. The RBS performed can be divided into three stages: planning, processing, and results. In the planning stage, the objectives of the research are defined, concepts for inclusion and exclusion of the works to be analyzed, the identified original works and the materials and methods. The next step, processing, results in job mapping. In this stage, the analysis of the objectives of the articles allowed to observe the convergence for themes related to quality, innovation, strategy, environmental improvement, environmental assessment, tool, integration, sector or particular product studied. The third step, results, ranks the articles by authorship and research focus. Finally, these articles were analyzed, and a set of DfE-related practices available in the literature was classified according to the stages of the product development cycle.

show abstract

An intelligent benchmark-based design for environment system for derivative electronic product development

Cited by 11 publications

References 9 publications

The S-Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems

The S-Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems

A systematic review of environmentally conscious product design

Panorama do design for environment: uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About