2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2004.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intensity correction for pole figure measurements by grazing incident and grazing exit angle X-ray diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a location correction is required whereby the orientation of the scattering vector in the sample coordinate system is described in terms of the tilt and rotation of the sample. The location corrections for the polar, α, and azimuthal, β, angles are given by (Njeh et al, 2004),…”
Section: Glancing Angle Texture Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a location correction is required whereby the orientation of the scattering vector in the sample coordinate system is described in terms of the tilt and rotation of the sample. The location corrections for the polar, α, and azimuthal, β, angles are given by (Njeh et al, 2004),…”
Section: Glancing Angle Texture Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies can include: phase composition, crystal structure, crystallite size, stress-strain analysis, texture, layers thickness, surface order-disorder transitions, diffusion behavior, crystallization rate etc. [1][2]. However, fixation of an angle (α angle) between the incident X-ray beam and sample surface leads to asymmetry in focusing of rays in GIXD technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%