2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intercomparison of four wet deposition schemes used in dust transport modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct measurements of dust concentrations are needed as well as optical depths, to allow both modeled concentrations and parametrized radiative properties to be assessed. Improved understanding and parametrizations of wet and dry deposition processes are also required (Jung and Shao, 2006;Petroff et al, 2008). The representation of radiative properties is another area where development would be useful.…”
Section: Summary and Status Of Dust In Earth System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements of dust concentrations are needed as well as optical depths, to allow both modeled concentrations and parametrized radiative properties to be assessed. Improved understanding and parametrizations of wet and dry deposition processes are also required (Jung and Shao, 2006;Petroff et al, 2008). The representation of radiative properties is another area where development would be useful.…”
Section: Summary and Status Of Dust In Earth System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tegen and Fung [] used a value of 750. Jung and Shao [] tested a value of 500 to compare different wet deposition schemes. This range fits quite well to the median S C mean (~600 to 2000) computed with the mean PM 10 concentrations, while the median S C max are slightly lower (55–142).…”
Section: Parameters Controlling the Deposition Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these recommendations, scavenging ratios have been used to compute dust deposition in 3-D models Tegen and Fung [1994]. used a value of 750 Jung and Shao [2006]. tested a value of 500 to compare different wet deposition schemes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large uncertainties remain, for instance, on how dry and wet dust deposition processes are modelled (Zhao et al, 2003;Textor et al, 2006;Jung and Shao, 2006;Bergametti and Forêt, 2014). Few experimental field measurements of dust deposition have been performed recently López-Garcia et al, 2013;Heimburger et al, 2013;Osada et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%