2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2020.103464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intergenic “safe haven” region in Cryptococcus neoformans serotype D genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expression of the inserted gene can be hampered by gene silencing and unstable expression due to position effects, a phenomenon in which the activity of a gene is affected by its location in the genome. To overcome this, gene expression at the GSH was established in some fungi such as C. neoformans, 22,23,38,39 A.fumigatus, 24,25 and Fusarium venenatum. 40 The candidate safe harbor intergenic regions of A. fumigatus and C. neoformans were screened based on the genome annotation and transcriptome data, e.g., SH1 and SH2 of A. fumigatus have convergent configuration with sizes between 1 and 5 kb and with little or no transcript reads, and the TPM values of their neighboring genes are close to the median or average TPM values of the RNA-seq.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of the inserted gene can be hampered by gene silencing and unstable expression due to position effects, a phenomenon in which the activity of a gene is affected by its location in the genome. To overcome this, gene expression at the GSH was established in some fungi such as C. neoformans, 22,23,38,39 A.fumigatus, 24,25 and Fusarium venenatum. 40 The candidate safe harbor intergenic regions of A. fumigatus and C. neoformans were screened based on the genome annotation and transcriptome data, e.g., SH1 and SH2 of A. fumigatus have convergent configuration with sizes between 1 and 5 kb and with little or no transcript reads, and the TPM values of their neighboring genes are close to the median or average TPM values of the RNA-seq.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach is to inactivate the ku70 or ku80 genes, creating NHEJ-deficient recipient strains that significantly improve the frequency of knockout mutants’ recovery [ 71 , 76 ]. To prevent ectopic integrations during complementation of null mutants from interfering with the virulence and other characteristics of the fungus, some authors have already reported genomic regions considered as safe for genetic integrations, such as the safe haven for C. neoformans [ 77 , 78 ] or RPS10 locus in Candida albicans [ 79 ]. Although we have not yet evaluated a potential safe region for gene reconstitution in Fonsecaea spp., this tool will be of great relevance when it was described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of a well-defined genetic locus for the integration of a transgenic construct is an important step towards establishing a standardized approach for genetic complementation of a gene KO mutant as well as integration of a transgenic construct for various functional genomics studies. Genomic safe-haven sites (also known as genetic safe-harbor sites or the genetic safe-landing sites) have been identified in several organisms including a number of human fungal pathogens (Arras et al 2015; Upadhya et al 2017; Fan and Lin 2020; Pham et al 2020). Recently two safe-haven regions (SH1 and SH2) were described in A. fumigatus located at intergenic regions of chromosome 1 and 2 of the Af293 genome (Pham et al 2020) however no evidence was presented with respect to their potential impact on virulence in a mammalian system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSHs are ideal integration sites for basic functional genomics research as well as for gene therapy applications. Similar genetic loci, which are known as “genomic safe-haven sites” (SH), have recently been identified and used successfully in a number of human pathogenic fungi (Arras et al 2015; Upadhya et al 2017; Fan and Lin 2018; Fan and Lin 2020). Recently, two potential genomic safe-haven regions SH1 and SH2 were identified in A. fumigatus based on genomic annotation and transcriptome data profiling (Pham et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%