2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interlaboratory study on passive sampling of emerging water pollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some rather low CVs were also found in year 2 for phenanthrene (3%), BDE 47 (8%), and BDE 154 (11%). When viewed on a log scale, none of the high or low CVs stand out as exceptional (Supplemental Data, S2), suggesting that log transformation of concentration data may provide a better basis for the data analysis of interlaboratory studies [8]. The observed CVs are similar to the values that are expected based on the Horwitz equation [19,20] CV ¼ 2C À0:5 log 2 ð4Þ…”
Section: Target Analytesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, some rather low CVs were also found in year 2 for phenanthrene (3%), BDE 47 (8%), and BDE 154 (11%). When viewed on a log scale, none of the high or low CVs stand out as exceptional (Supplemental Data, S2), suggesting that log transformation of concentration data may provide a better basis for the data analysis of interlaboratory studies [8]. The observed CVs are similar to the values that are expected based on the Horwitz equation [19,20] CV ¼ 2C À0:5 log 2 ð4Þ…”
Section: Target Analytesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Passive sampling has seen a rise in availability and popularity for monitoring programmes, 9,10 although conventional grab sampling is still considered 'the norm'. 11 It provides an in situ measurement of time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous interlaboratory studies (including the AQUAREF ILS [5] in 2010 and NORMAN ILS [6] in 2011) showed that accurate analysis of certain hydrophilic substances (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, perfluorinated compounds) remains a challenge for a number of laboratories. Inaccurate analyses contributed significantly to the observed high variability of water concentrations derived from PS data which cannot be attributed to inadequacies of the PS process.…”
Section: Which Passive Samplers Are Suitable For Monitoring Of Hydropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to endorse PS use in monitoring programmes, several actions have been conducted, including interlaboratory studies (ILS) to evaluate the performances of passive sampling methods with a focus on (i) hydrophobic substances in situ [3], (ii) hydrophobic substances in laboratory (ECLIPSE project, [4]), (iii) priority substances in situ (AQUAREF, www.aquaref.fr, [5]), and (iv) emerging substances in situ (NORMAN network, http://www.norman-network.net/?q=Home, with the Joint Research Centre's Institute for Environment and Sustainability, JRC-IES, [6]). Moreover, a NORMAN Expert Group meeting on "Linking Environmental Quality Standards and Passive Sampling" was organised in July 2013 in Brno (CZ) to discuss the possible routes for the implementation of passive sampling in regulatory monitoring for checking of compliance with Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for WFD priority and river basin-specific substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%