An international, multicenter, survey-based analysis of practice and management of acute liver failure

Abstract

Introduction: Acute liver failure (ALF) is an acute liver dysfunction with coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy in a patient with no known liver disease. As ALF is rare and large clinical trials are lacking, the level of evidence regarding its management is low-moderate, favoring heterogeneous clinical practice. In this international multicenter survey study, we aimed to investigate the current practice and management of patients with ALF. Methods: An online survey targeting physicians who care for patients with ALF was developed by the International Liver Transplantation Society ALF Special-Interest Group. The survey focused on management and liver transplantation (LT) practices of ALF. Survey questions were summarized overall and by geographic region. Results: A total of 267 physicians completed the survey with a survey response rate of 21.36%. Centers from all continents were represented. More than 90% of physicians were specialized in either transplant hepatology/surgery or anesthesiology/critical care. Two hundred and fifty-two (94.4%) respondents’ institutions offered LT. A total of 76.8% of respondents’ centers had a dedicated liver- or transplant- intensive care unit (p<0.001). Median time to LT was within 48 hours in 12.7% of respondents’ centers, 72 hours in 35.6%, one week in 37.6%, and more than one week in 9.6% (p<0.001). Deceased-donor liver graft (49.6%) was the most common type of graft offered. For consideration of LT, 84.8% of physicians used King’s College Criteria and 41.6% used Clichy Criteria. Significant differences were observed between Asia, Europe, and North America for offering LT, number of LTs performed, volume of ALF patients, admission to a dedicated intensive care unit, median time to LT, type of liver graft, monitoring hepatic encephalopathy and intracranial pressure, management of coagulopathy, and utilization of different criteria for LT. Discussion: In our study, we observed significant geographic differences in the practice and management of ALF. As ALF is rare multicenter studies are valuable to identify global practice.