An interpretable decision-support model for breast cancer diagnosis using histopathology images

Krishna, Sruthi; Suganthi, S.; Bhavsar, Arnav; Yasodharan, Jyotsna; Krishnamoorthy, Shivsubramani

doi:10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100319

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 7. The accuracy of each study[16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]45,47,48,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56]58,59]. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reviewing CAM-Based Deep Explainable Methods in Healthcare

Tang,

Chen,

Ren

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of artificial intelligence within the healthcare sector is consistently growing. However, the majority of deep learning-based AI systems are of a black box nature, causing these systems to suffer from a lack of transparency and credibility. Due to the widespread adoption of medical imaging for diagnostic purposes, the healthcare industry frequently relies on methods that provide visual explanations, enhancing interpretability. Existing research has summarized and explored the usage of visual explanation methods in the healthcare domain, providing introductions to the methods that have been employed. However, existing reviews are frequently used for interpretable analysis in the medical field ignoring comprehensive reviews on Class Activation Mapping (CAM) methods because researchers typically categorize CAM under the broader umbrella of visual explanations without delving into specific applications in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study primarily aims to analyze the specific applications of CAM-based deep explainable methods in the healthcare industry, following the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework. Specifically, we selected 45 articles for systematic review and comparative analysis from three databases—PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science—and then compared eight advanced CAM-based methods using five datasets to assist in method selection. Finally, we summarized current hotspots and future challenges in the application of CAM in the healthcare field.

show abstract

“…Figure 7. The accuracy of each study[16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]45,47,48,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56]58,59]. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%