2010
DOI: 10.1163/15406253-03703012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. By Karyn L. Lai. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. xiv, 307 Pp. Paperback, ISBN 978-052160892-3. Hardback, ISBN 978-052184646-2.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The philosophical origins of paradoxical framing are deeply rooted in ancient Western and Eastern cultures, as characterized by Socrates’ dialectical approach and Chinese yin–yang harmonizing dialectics (Lai, 2008 ). Yin–yang is recognized as the counterpart of the paradox theory that prevails in Western countries (Smith and Lewis, 2011 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The philosophical origins of paradoxical framing are deeply rooted in ancient Western and Eastern cultures, as characterized by Socrates’ dialectical approach and Chinese yin–yang harmonizing dialectics (Lai, 2008 ). Yin–yang is recognized as the counterpart of the paradox theory that prevails in Western countries (Smith and Lewis, 2011 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, yin often represents soft power, passive energies, and feminine aspects, whereas yang represents brutal strength, positive force, and masculine aspects (Lai, 2008 ; Zhou, 2004 ). Using the symbiosis interactions of yin and yang shown in the Taiji symbol as an exemplification: conflicting as a trade-off shows that yin and yang wane and wax between each other.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A student of Confucianism who became a key founder of Legalism and advisor to the Qin governmental regime, Han Fei (韩非, c280-233 BCE) argued that the only way to sustain proper order would be through laws and the application of punishment as necessary. Described variously as a ‘science of socio-political organisation’ (Schwartz, 1985: 335), a ‘theory of bureaucracy’ (Creel, 1974) and ‘an amoral science of statecraft’ (Graham, 1989: 267), Legalism, after Han Fei, integrated the themes of penal law ( fa, 法), statecraft ( shu, 术) and strategy, circumstantial advantage or power ( shi, 势) in proposals for effective government (Lai, 2008: 174). The establishment of strong bureaucratic power and the imposition of strict codes over socio-economic life were axiomatic.…”
Section: Three Schools Of Thought: Confucianism Legalism Daoismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional Chinese philosophies offer specific conceptualisations of the human–nature interrelationship which reflect the understanding of human existence and self-cultivation through interconnection and interrelatedness (Mou, 1993; Meng, 2002; Yuan and He, 2015; Yu, 2018). Ever since the burgeoning of different strands of philosophies since the Warring States era (starting from 476 BC), Confucianism and Taoism have greatly influenced Chinese philosophical thinking (Lai, 2016) through all-encompassing thinking, harmony and a complementary approach to dualism. Although Chinese Buddhism also exerted influence on Chinese philosophical thinking and culture, the fundamental understanding of human-nature concerning suffering and its eradication, as well as its doctrine on causality (see Lai, 2016), render it less useful as an analytical lens for the analysis of ecological aspects in this research.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since the burgeoning of different strands of philosophies since the Warring States era (starting from 476 BC), Confucianism and Taoism have greatly influenced Chinese philosophical thinking (Lai, 2016) through all-encompassing thinking, harmony and a complementary approach to dualism. Although Chinese Buddhism also exerted influence on Chinese philosophical thinking and culture, the fundamental understanding of human-nature concerning suffering and its eradication, as well as its doctrine on causality (see Lai, 2016), render it less useful as an analytical lens for the analysis of ecological aspects in this research. Thus, Chinese Buddhism is not included in the construction of the theoretical framework.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%