2007
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2007.344582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to PON technologies [Topics in Optical Communications]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are capable of providing much greater bandwidth than their copper-based alternatives resulting in much more efficient way of handling a potential increase in demand volumes in the future. Simultaneously, these networks allow keeping the necessary expenditures (both CAPEX and OPEX) at a reasonable level in comparison with the competing (EPON, Active Ethernet and optical P2P) technologies (see, e.g., [6,17]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are capable of providing much greater bandwidth than their copper-based alternatives resulting in much more efficient way of handling a potential increase in demand volumes in the future. Simultaneously, these networks allow keeping the necessary expenditures (both CAPEX and OPEX) at a reasonable level in comparison with the competing (EPON, Active Ethernet and optical P2P) technologies (see, e.g., [6,17]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both standards dedicate 1490 and 1310 nm for downstream and upstream transmission, respectively, with 1550 nm reserved for downstream video transmission. EPON is capable to support a maximum of 32 optical network units (ONUs), having symmetrical data rates of 1.25 Gbps at distances up to 20 km [4]. Unlike EPON, GPON can support up to a maximum of 128 ONUs for distance up to 60 km, and data rates of up to 2.5 Gbps [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WiFi is more mature than WiMAX, but it has a relatively small coverage range of only 100 m and a lower bit rate of 10-50 Mb/s. Despite these limitations, WiFi is more widely used for access today than WiMAX due to its maturity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus instead of sharing 50 Mb/s over all subscribers, DSL can provide 50 Mb/s to each end user. DSL is capable of 50-Mb/s transmission for loop lengths less than 300 ft, but can only provide 10 Mb/s over 10,000 ft [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation