1980
DOI: 10.1080/0141192800060104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to the Concepts and Methods of Multidimensional Scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirically, the validity of the rating scale was determined by the Multidimensional Scaling-PROXSCAL. The validity of each of the dimensions established a priori was determined using a Cronbach's alpha that reached a value for the whole scale of 0.89, which is considered highly positive (BORG;GROENEN;MAIR, 2013;O'HARE, 1980).…”
Section: Rating Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, the validity of the rating scale was determined by the Multidimensional Scaling-PROXSCAL. The validity of each of the dimensions established a priori was determined using a Cronbach's alpha that reached a value for the whole scale of 0.89, which is considered highly positive (BORG;GROENEN;MAIR, 2013;O'HARE, 1980).…”
Section: Rating Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multidimensional scaling techniques have previously been applied to a range of developmental topics including the comparison of children's and adults' memory development (Arabie, Kosslyn, & Nelson, 1975;Kosslyn, Pick, & Fariello, 1974) and the tracing of developmental changes in semantic structure underlying mammal names (Howard & Howard, 1977). Further examples are described by O'Hare (1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%