2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-distance based evaluation for aggregated dynamic decision analysis (IF-DEVADA): Its application to waste disposal location selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MCDM problems, various analyzes are often used to search for the robustness of the proposed methodology which are sensitivity analysis, validity analysis and comparative analysis ( Alkan and Kahraman, 2022 , Celik and Gul, 2021 , Gul and Ak, 2021 , Haktanır and Kahraman, 2022 , İlbahar et al, 2022 , Karasan et al, 2022 , Karaşan et al, 2021 ). Through these analyses, the results are tried to be verified and the changes in the outputs can be observed.…”
Section: Robustness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MCDM problems, various analyzes are often used to search for the robustness of the proposed methodology which are sensitivity analysis, validity analysis and comparative analysis ( Alkan and Kahraman, 2022 , Celik and Gul, 2021 , Gul and Ak, 2021 , Haktanır and Kahraman, 2022 , İlbahar et al, 2022 , Karasan et al, 2022 , Karaşan et al, 2021 ). Through these analyses, the results are tried to be verified and the changes in the outputs can be observed.…”
Section: Robustness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al [6] explained the basic properties of IFS information. Alkan et al [7] discussed the distance measure based method under IFS information and their application to DMs problems. Thao et al [8] explained the similarity measure under IFS information and their application to real life decision making problems.…”
Section: A Brief Review On the Development Of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, MAGDM problems are too scientific and complex to evaluate by simple real number and operation. The FSs and its extension provide to contain more information [36][37][38][39] and MADM methods provide different theories to evaluate the attribute weight and the alternatives [40][41][42][43]. Different from other methods, MABAC [44] evaluates the alternative by defining the distance between possible solution and border approximation area, and is a classical method utilized in different fuzzy sets which include Pythagorean Fuzzy sets (PFSs) Peng and Yang [45], interval neutrosophic sets (INSs) [46], interval type-2 fuzzy [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%