2003
DOI: 10.1021/ed080p214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intuitive Look at the Relationship of Ki and IC50: A More General Use for the Dixon Plot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial velocities were determined at each of the substrate concentrations tested. Inhibition data for a range of concentrations of each competitive inhibitor at a constant concentration of the nucleotide phosphate donor were plotted as a Dixon plot ([I] vs 1/V) to give the IC 50 value at that [S] as the opposite value of the x intercept (29). K m values were calculated either in the absence or in the presence of increasing concentrations of inhibitor from Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plots of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial velocities were determined at each of the substrate concentrations tested. Inhibition data for a range of concentrations of each competitive inhibitor at a constant concentration of the nucleotide phosphate donor were plotted as a Dixon plot ([I] vs 1/V) to give the IC 50 value at that [S] as the opposite value of the x intercept (29). K m values were calculated either in the absence or in the presence of increasing concentrations of inhibitor from Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plots of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This downstream factor indicates signaling that is induced by Gprotein-coupled receptors, in which cAMP levels increase upon activation of the receptors or decrease upon inhibition of the receptors (Tate, 2012). For all of the assays, classic enzyme kinetics are the basis for calculating pharmacological determinants (i.e., IC 50 , EC 50 , and K i values; Burlingham & Widlanski, 2003;Cheng & Prusoff, 1973).…”
Section: Methods For Studying Transporter and Receptor Pharmacology Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these considerations comparison of IC 50 values within one laboratory is unproblematic. For direct comparison of pharmacological constants between different laboratories K i values should be assessed, since IC 50 but not K i values depend significantly on assay conditions (Burlingham & Widlanski, 2003). The determination of K i values is more complex because it requires knowledge or assessment of the mode of inhibition (e.g., competitive, noncompetitive, or mixed; Burlingham & Widlanski, 2003).…”
Section: Methods For Studying Transporter and Receptor Pharmacology Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) were analyzed by Dixon 26,39 and Lineweaver-Burk 26 plots to evaluate the possible mechanisms of enzyme inhibition.…”
Section: Determination Of Cyp Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%