2015
DOI: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1022154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse uniqueness on the index of refraction with a transition region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we prove the result as a special case of interior transmission problem [2,4,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,21,22,24,25,28,29,31]. In interior transmission problems, we look for a frequency so that a perturbed stationary wave behaves like or somewhere like a spherical Bessel function outside the perturbation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Here we prove the result as a special case of interior transmission problem [2,4,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,21,22,24,25,28,29,31]. In interior transmission problems, we look for a frequency so that a perturbed stationary wave behaves like or somewhere like a spherical Bessel function outside the perturbation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Most important of all, the estimates from (2.14) to (2.17) show that they are entire functions of order one and of type ξ. We refer details to [1,10,12,14,23,25]. Accordingly their zero sets are described by Cartwright's theory [2,8,9,21,22].…”
Section: Asymptotic Expansions and Cartwright-levinson Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two terms do not cancel each other if n 1 = n 2 . We skip the details and refer it to [10,11,12,15].…”
Section: Asymptotic Expansions and Cartwright-levinson Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whenever the zero crossing density exceeds its theoretical maximal quantity, the function must be identically zero. This renders an inverse uniqueness on the scatterer, as we have discussed in [3,4,5]. The assumption on the neighborhood U in Theorem 1.1 can be replaced by the assumptions on the numerical quantity of the zero-crossing density of f (x, ν, k).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%