An investigation into the erroneous access and egress behaviours of building users and their impact upon building performance

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the behaviour of building users and how this impacts upon building energy performance. Specifically, the work examines the behavioural traits of able-bodied users of a large higher education building who erroneously access and egress the building using doorways intended for disabled users. Design/methodology/approach An inductive methodological approach is adopted that uses grounded theory to devise new insights into building users’ access and egress habits. Structured interviews are conducted to collect primary data from 68 building users of a large educational building over a four-week period. Responses to questions posed provide the basis for a tabularisation of behavioural traits. Findings Reasons for able-bodied building users’ preferences to using disabled access are identified and discussed; these are thematically grouped under the headings of apathy, convenience, emergency, ergonomics, ignorance and phobia. Building upon these findings, the research then offers insights into the approaches that could be adopted to change the erroneous behaviours. These approaches include education of building users on the impact their behaviour has upon building performance and environmental pollution, more stringent regulation to penalise repeat offenders and changes to building entrance design using obtrusive (i.e. radio frequency identification tags) and unobstrusive control measures (i.e. a second entrance doorway or slower opening mechanism). Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to investigate the rationale for able-bodied building users erroneously using disabled persons’ access and egress doorways within a building, which as a consequence, inadvertently reduces the building’s environmental performance.

Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry

“…An interpretivist philosophical design is implemented for this research using published literature as the unit of analysis (Roberts et al, 2019), where interpretivism allows for the researcher's individual nuance and variability in their interaction with (in this case literature) to interpret and/or comprehend new knowledge, perspectives and generate wisdom (Dixon et al, 2020). Consequently, this philosophical stance is broadly categorised as being an inductive paradigm (Al-Saeed et al, 2019).…”

Underlying indicators for measuring smartness of buildings in the construction industry

“…Al-Saeed et al, 2020;Mohamed et al, 2020) and empirical (cf. Edwards et al, 2020) epistemological design was adopted for this research to analyse primary quantitative data (Dixon et al, 2020). Post-positivism was achieved via the use of perception data collated via a structured questionnaire that was rigorously analysed using summary and inferential statisticssuch being an established technique used throughout construction management literature (cf.…”

Integrating BIM in Higher Education Programs: Barriers and Remedial Solutions in Australia

“…To analyse the perceptions and experiences of educators, this research adopted a post-positivist philosophical design (Roberts et al 2019) to analyse qualitative primary data collecting from a cross sectional time horizon. This broad approach has been used extensively within construction literature, for example: Dixon et al (2020) undertook an investigation into the erroneous access and egress behaviours of building users and their impact upon building performance; Al-Saeed et al (2020) developed an automated manufacturing procedures using BIM digital objects; and Mohamed et al (2019) explored industry practitioners' knowledge of fire prevention following the Grenfell disaster.…”