2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the laboratory method for the evaluation of the performance of kinetic hydrate inhibitors using superheated gas hydrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superheating test method was used in earlier studies from our research group to increase the reproducibility of T o values or induction times in standard constant cooling and isothermal tests, respectively. 8 The ranking of KHIs using the superheating constant cooling test method is consistent with those from the standard constant cooling method, provided that the correct test conditions and test methods are used. Dependent upon the chosen hydrate dissociation temperature and duration, some systems (especially those of different KHI classes) might contain different amounts of non-melted hydrates.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The superheating test method was used in earlier studies from our research group to increase the reproducibility of T o values or induction times in standard constant cooling and isothermal tests, respectively. 8 The ranking of KHIs using the superheating constant cooling test method is consistent with those from the standard constant cooling method, provided that the correct test conditions and test methods are used. Dependent upon the chosen hydrate dissociation temperature and duration, some systems (especially those of different KHI classes) might contain different amounts of non-melted hydrates.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a more accurate alternative, subcooling temperatures at the onset of hydrate nucleation were measured in order to evaluate the KHIs. Previous studies have established that measurements of subcooling temperatures are less variable than those of induction times1047.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). These methods have been frequently used to assess the performance of KHIs on a laboratory scale47.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autoclave which is made of stainless steel, is cylindrical with a volume of 750 mL. The relative large volume of autoclave could reduce the stochastic effect for hydrate nucleation (Villano and Kelland, 2011), thus ensuring experimental repeatability. The working temperature range is between À20 and 90 C, and the temperature is controlled by a circulator bath and is measured with two temperature sensors to an accuracy of ±0.05 C. The pressure in the autoclave is measured with a pressure sensor to an accuracy of ±0.01 MPa, ranging from 0 to 40 MPa.…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%