An investigation into the use of land-based financing to fund infrastructure in South Africa

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand how the nature of infrastructure as a public good has traditionally lent itself to state provision and to review how land-based financing (LBF) can be used to overcome the public infrastructure funding constraints in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach The paper is largely based on a review and analysis of the academic literature, government reports and reports from research institutions such as the World Bank, Department for International Development, Urban Land Institute and the Lincoln Institute. Findings The paper finds that although a number of LBF instruments are being used in South Africa, the majority of them are not suited to addressing the current infrastructure funding constraint. However, the paper finds that some LBF mechanisms, such as tax-increment financing (TIF), that are currently not used could play a role provided that certain preconditions are met. Research limitations/implications LBF has only partially been implemented in South Africa, thus the paper is limited to exploring the issues, challenges and necessary policy and regulatory changes needed to support LBF. Practical implications The review of LBF mechanisms currently being used in South Africa highlights many of their practical limitations. Furthermore, concrete proposals and legislative amendments are proposed in the paper regarding the implementation of additional funding instruments such as TIF. Social implications Infrastructure is regarded as a key precondition for socio-economic development. LBF offers a viable and important alternative for fiscally constraint governments in emerging economies to fund infrastructure provision. Originality/value The main contribution of the paper is its focus on the use of LBF in the under-researched Sub-Saharan African context.

Integrating Land Value Capture Into Infrastructure Investment Planning in South Africa: A Local Government Framework

“…Globally infrastructure development is known as a key factor for economic growth, poverty and inequality reducer (McGaffin et al 2019). Infrastructure development serves a cri cal role in na on-building and economic stability, development and sustainability (Scien fic Council for Government Policy, 2008).…”

“…Municipali es are funded from the collec on of their revenues, and the na onal government transfers these based on the Division of Revenue Act 2 of 2013. However, the ability of the na onal government to fund municipali es through na onal transfer is constrained by the decline in economic growth and the government's reduced tax revenue collec on (McGaffin, 2019;Vukeya, 2015). The funding constraints places pressure on municipali es to do trade-offs between infrastructure investment for economic development and re-dressing of historical development imbalances (McGaffin et al 2019).…”

The Influence of Infrastructure Financing on Rural Municipalities in Limpopo Province, South Africa: Issue for Consideration

“…Neally all the government's industrial strategies highligt infrastructure investment as an essential job growth enricher. McGaffin, Viruly and Boyle (2021) posit that infrastructure is a prinicipal component in stimulating economic recovery and alleviating in poverty. In addition, equitable shares enable municipalities to provide municipal services to households with limited resources so they can enjoy affordable basic services and enhance the governance capacity to perform core municipal functions adequately (National Treasury, Republic of South Africa 2018).…”

Development of urban infrastructure through land-based financing: A case of Bharatpur metropolitan city (Residential area)

“…Infrastructure is widely regarded as a critical component in promoting economic growth and alleviating poverty and inequality across the world. [4]. World Bank (2014) emphasizes the importance of three "I" s -Investment, Infrastructure, and Inclusion-for the development of Nepal [5].…”