An Investment Framework for Nutrition in Kenya

Eberwein, Julia Dayton; Kakietek, Jakub; Beni, Davide De; Moloney, Grainne; Pereira, Audrey; Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku; Volege, Marjorie; Matu, Sicily; Shekar, Meera

doi:10.1596/26284

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Effective MNG requires various sectors to collaborate and coordinate coherently. Insufficient indices and mechanisms for multisectoral collaboration and coordination within and among various sectors involved in nutrition hinder the effective implementation of integrated nutrition interventions ( 72 , 76 ) . There is a need for Kenya to put emphasis on coordination frameworks that bring together relevant sectors, especially non-traditional sectors to facilitate multisectoral collaboration and coordination.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resource mobilisation and commitment are yet to meet the requirements stipulated in the KNNAP. Limited resource allocation not only affects implementation but also impedes the capacity to assess progress ( 76 ) . Generation of evidence on MNG progress, successes, challenges and impact will bolster advocacy for additional resources for multisectoral nutrition actions in Kenya.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Utilising emerging perspectives at the global and regional level to frame multisectoral nutrition governance landscape in Kenya

Korir,

Oldewage-Theron,

Mugambi

et al. 2024

Public Health Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Multisectoral Nutrition Governance (MNG) is a vital enabling determinant of improved nutrition outcomes. Despite this, it remains to be a complex phenomenon that lacks adequate understanding, especially in developing countries like Kenya. This narrative review aims to discuss the evolution of MNG, the current state of MNG, barriers and challenges, and based on these identify entry points for improvement within the complex governance structure in Kenya. Design: The Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to ensure rigorous and transparent identification of literature and interpretation. Setting: Kenya and developing countries with similar contexts. Participants: The review included 45 documents (peer-reviewed articles and grey literature) that reported on MNG in developing countries. Results: We acknowledge that MNG is a complex and evolving determinant of better nutrition outcomes. The paper highlights challenges Kenya and other developing countries face such as inadequate leadership, inadequate coordination, insufficient capacity, inadequate monitoring and evaluation systems, and limited financial resources, among others. For Kenya in particular, there is inadequate understanding of what MNG is, and how it can be effectively operationalized and tracked. Conclusions: To enhance understanding of MNG in Kenya, a country-specific assessment of MNG processes and impact outcomes using standard tools and defined metrics is vital. Such assessment will generate evidence of progress, successes, and challenges that will compel the government and stakeholders to invest more in multisectoral nutrition approaches to achieve its’ nutrition goals.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%