“…The energy was originally given in terms of changes in atomic charges relative to a set of reference charges, Δ , but for comparison with the other models, the Q form will be used (Supporting Information), and E ACKS2 can, with the notation from the CRK section, be written as in eq . The E ACKS2 can be considered as including the FQ and CRK expressions in eqs and . In the original ACKS2 paper and in subsequent work, − the operational equations are derived by making the Lagrange function in eq stationary, where two Lagrange multipliers λ Q and λ V are introduced to ensure Q and V conservation, and this results in the four coupled equations in eq . The singular nature of the K matrix, however, makes λ V equal 0 (Supporting Information), and the second equation becomes eq . This is identical to the CRK expression in eq , but without a partitioning into internal and external components for K and V . The remaining ACKS2 equations can be solved explicitly (Supporting Information), with the result for Q given in eq . The 1 t K = 0 condition ensures that eq always provides the correct molecular charge, and λ Q is thus redundant and can be omitted. Equation with λ Q = 0 can be rewritten to eq (Supporting Information), showing the equivalence to the CRK expression in eq with a redefinition of the reference charges Q 0 . Using eq allows the last two terms in eq to be condensed into one, as shown in eq . Analogous to the CRK case in eq , E ACKS2 c...…”