An objective system for appraising clear aligner treatment difficulty: clear aligner treatment complexity assessment tool (CAT–CAT)

Abstract

Background Recent years have witnessed a remarkable evolution of clear aligner technology and clear aligners are becoming more and more versatile in treating orthodontic patients. The aim of this study was to develop an objective evaluation system for assessing clear aligner treatment difficulty. Methods A total of 120 eligible patients (100 patients for developing and testing the evaluation system and 20 patients for validating this system) were recruited in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Based on clinical data (dental models, radiographs and photographs), complexity levels of cases were evaluated by two experts and regarded as the gold standard. Difficulty scores were determined through an evaluation system encompassing three domains (dental model analysis, radiographic examinations and clinical examinations). The reliability of the evaluation system was examined through analyzing the agreement between complexity levels and difficulty scores. Moreover, multivariable linear regression test was used to examine the independent association of each variable (e.g. overbite and crowding) with the complexity level. Results The results revealed that the assessment of treatment difficulty by this objective evaluation system substantially matched the gold standard (R2 = 0.80). The multivariable regression test revealed that complexity level was significantly associated with difficulty score (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.015), tooth extraction (p < 0.001), treatment stage (p < 0.01) and the number of difficult tooth movement (p = 0.005). This objective evaluation system elaborated in this study was viable and reliable in appraising clear-aligner treatment difficulty in clinical practice. Conclusions We suggest orthodontists and general practitioners use this objective evaluation system (CAT-CAT) to appraise clear aligner treatment difficulty and to select appropriate clear aligner patients.

RETRACTED: Development of a Systematic Course On Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) for Orthodontic Residency Program

“…With the development of orthodontic materials and advances in orthodontic techniques, clear aligner appeals to orthodontic patients for its comfort and ease of oral hygiene care. (22,23) A recent treatment-di culty evaluation system on clear aligner revealed that clear aligner had its distinct biochemical system and different types of di cult tooth movements as compared to xed appliances, (24) suggesting that clear aligner may require more additional anchorage than xed appliances. A recent nite-element study revealed that an anterior inter-radicular miniscrew between central incisors was effective for incisor intrusion and palatal torquing during anterior retraction.…”

Clear Aligners and Smart Eye Tracking Technology as a New Communication Strategy between Ethical and Legal Issues

“…The alternative using ceramic or composite resin aesthetic brackets was well received, but certainly the most welcome option is removable and transparent aligners [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Clear aligners are now widely used to treat not only simple cases, but also moderately complex or severely complex cases, even in the form of hybrid therapies [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]. In fact, clear aligner systems have substantially evolved both from a mechanical standpoint, with respect to the strategies that can be implemented to move teeth, and from a design and manufacturing perspective.…”

Biomechanical analysis of effective mandibular en-masse retraction using Class II elastics with a clear aligner: a finite element study

“…The demand for clear aligner (CA) therapy has increased dramatically thanks to its advantages of aesthetics, therapeutic comfort, and engagement of new biomaterial [ 1 ]. It has been reported that the number of clinical cases for the treatment of malocclusion via CA is continuously growing and approaching to the number of cases treated by conventional technique, fixed appliances (FA) [ 2 , 3 ]. However, it is suggested that CA therapy is mainly performed for non-extraction cases with minimal root movement [ 4 – 6 ].…”